Abel L, Vu D L, Oberti J, Nguyen V T, Van V C, Guilloud-Bataille M, Schurr E, Lagrange P H
INSERM U. 194, Hôpital St. Louis, Paris, France.
Genet Epidemiol. 1995;12(1):63-82. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370120107.
To investigate the nature of the genetic component controlling susceptibility to leprosy and its subtypes, 402 nuclear families were ascertained through a leprosy patient followed at the Dermatology Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam; 285 families were of Vietnamese origin and 117 were of Chinese origin with a higher proportion of lepromatous forms among Chinese patients. Segregation analyses were conducted using the model developed by Abel and Bonney [(1990) Genet Epidemiol 7:391-407], which accounted for variable age of onset and time-dependent covariates. Three phenotypes were considered: leprosy per se (all forms of leprosy together), nonlepromatous leprosy, and lepromatous leprosy. For each of this phenotype, analyses were performed on the whole sample and separately on the Vietnamese and the Chinese families. The results showed that a single Mendelian gene could not account for the familial distributions of leprosy per se and its two subtypes in the whole sample. However, these results were different according to the ethnic origin of the families. In the Vietnamese subsample, there was evidence for a codominant major gene with residual familial dependences for the leprosy per se phenotype, and borderline rejection of the Mendelian transmission hypothesis for the nonlepromatous phenotype. In Chinese families, strong rejection of Mendelian transmission was obtained in the analysis of leprosy per se, and no evidence for a familial component in the distribution of the nonlepromatous phenotype was observed. For the lepromatous phenotype, the discrimination between models was poor, and no definitive conclusion could be reached. Referring to immunological data, we suggest that these results could be explained by a heterogeneity in the definition of the lepromatous phenotype. It is likely that progress in the understanding of the genetic components involved in the expression of leprosy will come from a better definition of the phenotype under study, and immunological studies are ongoing in this population to investigate this hypothesis.
为了研究控制麻风病易感性及其亚型的遗传成分的性质,通过越南胡志明市皮肤病医院的一名麻风病患者确定了402个核心家庭;其中285个家庭为越南裔,117个家庭为华裔,华裔患者中瘤型麻风的比例更高。使用Abel和Bonney[(1990)《遗传流行病学》7:391 - 407]开发的模型进行分离分析,该模型考虑了发病年龄的变化和时间依赖性协变量。考虑了三种表型:麻风病本身(所有形式的麻风病)、结核样型麻风病和瘤型麻风病。对于每种表型,在整个样本上进行分析,并分别在越南家庭和华裔家庭中进行分析。结果表明,单个孟德尔基因无法解释整个样本中麻风病本身及其两种亚型的家族分布。然而,根据家庭的种族来源,这些结果有所不同。在越南子样本中,有证据表明存在一个共显性主基因,对于麻风病本身表型存在残余家族依赖性,对于结核样型表型,孟德尔遗传假说接近被拒绝。在华裔家庭中,在麻风病本身的分析中强烈拒绝孟德尔遗传,并且在结核样型表型的分布中未观察到家族成分的证据。对于瘤型表型,模型之间的区分较差,无法得出明确结论。参考免疫学数据,我们认为这些结果可以通过瘤型表型定义的异质性来解释。对麻风病表达中涉及的遗传成分的理解进展可能来自于对所研究表型的更好定义,并且正在对该人群进行免疫学研究以调查这一假说。