• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

松鼠猴中多巴胺D2激动剂引起的抓挠行为的药理学分析。

Pharmacological analysis of the scratching produced by dopamine D2 agonists in squirrel monkeys.

作者信息

Pellón R, Flores P, Alling K, Witkin J M, Katz J L

机构信息

Psychobiology Section, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Apr;273(1):138-45.

PMID:7714759
Abstract

Several dopamine agonists, administered i.m., produced persistent, excessive and non-localized scratching in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). Studies were conducted with a series of drugs to determine the pharmacological mechanisms responsible for this effect. All of the dopamine D2 agonists studied produced dose-related increases in scratching, whereas several dopamine D1 receptor agonists, indirect dopamine agonists and drugs acting on other receptors failed to produce dose-related increases in scratching. The scratching produced by D2 agonists was stereospecific; (-)-NPA produced scratching whereas its (+)-enantiomer was inactive up to doses 300-fold higher. Scratching induced by quinpirole was attenuated by both D2 and D1 antagonists, and this antagonism was stereospecific, with the D2 antagonist (-)-eticlopride, but not its enantiomer, active. Sensitivity developed to the effects of D2 agonists with the quinpirole dose-effect curve shifting to the left by a factor of approximately 64. Two partial D2 receptor agonists (SDZ 208-911 and SDZ 208-912) had limited efficacy in producing scratching, however, one partial D2 receptor agonist (terguride) was fully efficacious, suggesting that there are spare receptors for this effect. The peripherally active dopamine antagonist domperidone and the histamine antagonist diphenhydramine also reduced the scratching induced by D2 agonists, but not to the same extent as centrally acting D2 antagonists. Scratching in squirrel monkeys is an effect that appears to be due to agonist actions at D2 receptors, and may be mediated by a release of histamine. This behavioral activity may be useful as an in vivo indication of D2 receptor activity in primates.

摘要

几种肌肉注射的多巴胺激动剂在松鼠猴(Saimiri sciureus)身上引发了持续、过度且无局部定位的抓挠行为。我们使用一系列药物进行了研究,以确定造成这种效应的药理机制。所有研究的多巴胺D2激动剂均产生了与剂量相关的抓挠增加,而几种多巴胺D1受体激动剂、间接多巴胺激动剂以及作用于其他受体的药物均未产生与剂量相关的抓挠增加。D2激动剂引发的抓挠具有立体特异性;(-)-NPA会引发抓挠,而其(+)-对映体在高达300倍剂量时仍无活性。喹吡罗诱导的抓挠可被D2和D1拮抗剂减弱,且这种拮抗作用具有立体特异性,D2拮抗剂(-)-依托必利有活性,而其对映体无活性。对D2激动剂的敏感性增强,喹吡罗剂量效应曲线向左移动约64倍。两种部分D2受体激动剂(SDZ 208-911和SDZ 208-912)在引发抓挠方面效果有限,然而,一种部分D2受体激动剂(替告瑞林)效果完全,这表明存在这种效应的备用受体。外周活性多巴胺拮抗剂多潘立酮和组胺拮抗剂苯海拉明也能减少D2激动剂诱导的抓挠,但程度不如中枢作用的D2拮抗剂。松鼠猴的抓挠行为似乎是由于D2受体上的激动剂作用,可能由组胺释放介导。这种行为活动可能作为灵长类动物体内D2受体活性的一种指示。

相似文献

1
Pharmacological analysis of the scratching produced by dopamine D2 agonists in squirrel monkeys.松鼠猴中多巴胺D2激动剂引起的抓挠行为的药理学分析。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Apr;273(1):138-45.
2
Characterization of unconditioned behavioral effects of dopamine D3/D2 receptor agonists.多巴胺D3/D2受体激动剂的非条件行为效应特征
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Oct;283(1):7-15.
3
Drug discrimination in methamphetamine-trained monkeys: agonist and antagonist effects of dopaminergic drugs.甲基苯丙胺训练的猴子中的药物辨别:多巴胺能药物的激动剂和拮抗剂作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Jun;285(3):1163-74.
4
Dopamine D1- and D2-like receptor mechanisms in relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior: effects of selective antagonists and agonists.多巴胺D1样和D2样受体机制在可卡因觅药行为复发中的作用:选择性拮抗剂和激动剂的影响
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 Aug;294(2):680-7.
5
Dopamine D1 receptor involvement in the discriminative-stimulus effects of SKF 81297 in squirrel monkeys.多巴胺D1受体参与SKF 81297对松鼠猴的辨别刺激效应。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Nov;267(2):765-75.
6
Effects of dopamine D1 ligands on eye blinking in monkeys: efficacy, antagonism, and D1/D2 interactions.多巴胺D1配体对猴子眨眼的影响:功效、拮抗作用及D1/D2相互作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Dec;311(3):1008-15. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.071092. Epub 2004 Aug 3.
7
Agonist efficacy and the behavioral effects of dopamine D1 receptor ligands: drug interaction studies in squirrel monkeys.多巴胺D1受体配体的激动剂效力及行为效应:松鼠猴的药物相互作用研究
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Mar;276(3):942-50.
8
Behavioral effects of cocaine: interactions with D1 dopaminergic antagonists and agonists in mice and squirrel monkeys.可卡因的行为效应:与小鼠和松鼠猴体内D1多巴胺能拮抗剂及激动剂的相互作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 Oct;291(1):265-79.
9
Modulation of heroin and cocaine self-administration by dopamine D1- and D2-like receptor agonists in rhesus monkeys.多巴胺D1样和D2样受体激动剂对恒河猴海洛因和可卡因自我给药行为的调节作用
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007 Jun;321(3):1135-43. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.120766. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
10
Modification of the behavioral effects of the selective dopamine D2 agonist (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine by dopamine antagonists in monkeys.多巴胺拮抗剂对猴子体内选择性多巴胺D2激动剂(+)-4-丙基-9-羟基萘并恶嗪行为效应的影响
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 Jun;265(3):1039-46.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct Roles of Dopamine Receptor Subtypes in the Nucleus Accumbens during Itch Signal Processing.伏隔核中多巴胺受体亚型在瘙痒信号处理中的不同作用。
J Neurosci. 2022 Nov 23;42(47):8842-8854. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0821-22.2022. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
2
Central circuit mechanisms of itch.痒觉的中枢环路机制。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 16;11(1):3052. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16859-5.
3
Dynamics and Functional Role of Dopaminergic Neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area during Itch Processing.腹侧被盖区多巴胺能神经元在瘙痒处理过程中的动力学和功能作用。
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 14;38(46):9856-9869. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1483-18.2018. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
4
Suppression of cocaine- and food-maintained behavior by the D2-like receptor partial agonist terguride in squirrel monkeys.D2样受体部分激动剂terguride对松鼠猴可卡因及食物维持行为的抑制作用
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Mar;166(3):298-305. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1347-0. Epub 2003 Feb 13.
5
Self-administration of D1 receptor agonists by squirrel monkeys.松鼠猴对D1受体激动剂的自我给药
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996 May;125(2):97-104. doi: 10.1007/BF02249407.