Tomberg C
Brain Research Unit, University of Brussels, Belgium.
Neurosci Lett. 1995 Jan 30;184(3):153-6. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)11194-n.
Electronic averaging is currently used for displaying event-related potentials such as P300 from the electroencephalogram (EEG). However, there is a growing need for upgraded methods allowing cognitive components to be identified in single trial brain responses. The Z estimation method has been adapted for the topographic testing of non-averaged scalp recordings. Z values approximating +1 help validate a genuine P300 while failure to pass the Z test may suggest the spurious nature of a late positivity that mimicks a P300. Z testing can also identify interference from transient EEG alpha activity by showing alternations between +1 and -1 values, as expected from an oscillating alpha generator. In contrast with previous methods based on EEG recordings from a single scalp site, our topographic Z method takes into account 28 scalp sites for single trials testing.
目前,电子平均法用于显示脑电图(EEG)中与事件相关的电位,如P300。然而,对升级方法的需求日益增长,以便能够在单次试验脑反应中识别认知成分。Z估计法已被应用于非平均头皮记录的地形图测试。接近+1的Z值有助于验证真正的P300,而未能通过Z测试可能表明模仿P300的晚期阳性的虚假性质。Z测试还可以通过显示+1和-1值之间的交替来识别瞬态EEG阿尔法活动的干扰,这是振荡阿尔法发生器所预期的。与以前基于单个头皮部位EEG记录的方法不同,我们的地形图Z方法在单次试验测试中考虑了28个头皮部位。