Letendre L, Levitt R, Pierre R V, Schroeder G, Krook J A, Mailliard J E, Morton R F, Tschetter L K
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Am J Hematol. 1995 Apr;48(4):233-6. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830480405.
We prospectively treated 46 patients with favorable myelodysplastic syndrome classified as refractory anemia (RA), refractory cytopenia (RC), or refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (RARS). These patients received one of two schedules of 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid (low dose 80 mg daily for 6 months vs. high dose 200 mg po daily for 3 months), or Danazol (800 mg po daily for 3 months), and were crossed over to the alternative drug in the absence of response or at progression. Using strict criteria of response we found little objective evidence of activity for either compound. Only two minor responses were seen among 22 patients treated with low dose 13-CRA, 1 response among 20 cases that received high dose 13-CRA, and 1 partial response and 1 minor response to Danazol among 34 cases. Neither 13-Cis-Retinoic Acid nor Danazol appear active enough in patients with favorable myelodysplastic syndrome to justify their use.
我们前瞻性地治疗了46例预后良好的骨髓增生异常综合征患者,这些患者被分类为难治性贫血(RA)、难治性血细胞减少症(RC)或伴有环形铁粒幼细胞的难治性贫血(RARS)。这些患者接受了两种治疗方案之一:13-顺式维甲酸(低剂量每日80毫克,持续6个月,与高剂量每日口服200毫克,持续3个月),或达那唑(每日口服800毫克,持续3个月),并且在无反应或病情进展时换用另一种药物。使用严格的反应标准,我们几乎没有发现这两种化合物有客观的活性证据。在接受低剂量13-CRA治疗的22例患者中仅观察到2例轻微反应,在接受高剂量13-CRA治疗的20例患者中观察到1例反应,在接受达那唑治疗的34例患者中观察到1例部分反应和1例轻微反应。13-顺式维甲酸和达那唑在预后良好的骨髓增生异常综合征患者中似乎都没有足够的活性来证明其使用的合理性。