Trappe H J, Fieguth H G, Pfitzner P, Heintze J, Wenzlaff P, Kielblock B
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Hannover, Germany.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):127-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02490.x.
The intraoperative and long-term results were reviewed in 67 patients who underwent implantation of the Ventritex Cadence defibrillator with either epicardial patch (EPI, 25 patients) or nonthoracotomy CPI Endotak (ENDO, 42 patients) defibrillation lead systems. In the ENDO group, 35 patients (83%) had a defibrillation threshold (DFT) of < or = 20 joules and did not require a subcutaneous patch. Intraoperatively, the DFT was 13 +/- 9 joules (mean +/- SD) for EPI and 15 +/- 8 joules for ENDO (P = NS). There was no perioperative death in either group. During a mean follow-up of 12 +/- 8 months, there was no sudden death, and four patients died from congestive heart failure (3 EPI, 1 ENDO). During follow-up, 875 spontaneous arrhythmia episodes (AE) occurred in 15 of 25 EPI patients (60%), versus 652 in 28 of 42 ENDO patients (67%; P = NS). Ventricular tachycardia at a rate > or = 222 beats/min or ventricular fibrillation represented 167 AE for EPI (19%) and 182 AE for ENDO (28%), and was terminated by the first shock in 76% and 75% of attempts, respectively. Ventricular tachycardia at a rate < 222 beats/min represented a total of 1,178 AE and antitachycardia pacing was successful in 660 of 708 AE (93%) with EPI and 414 of 470 AE (88%) with ENDO lead systems (P = NS). Therefore, a nonthoracotomy approach using the Cadence V-100 is safe and effective and has clinical results that are not significantly different from epicardial defibrillation lead systems.
回顾了67例行Ventritex Cadence除颤器植入术患者的术中及长期结果,这些患者分别采用了心外膜贴片(EPI组,25例)或非开胸CPI Endotak(ENDO组,42例)除颤导联系统。在ENDO组中,35例患者(83%)的除颤阈值(DFT)≤20焦耳,无需皮下贴片。术中,EPI组的DFT为13±9焦耳(均值±标准差),ENDO组为15±8焦耳(P=无显著性差异)。两组均无围手术期死亡。在平均12±8个月的随访期间,无猝死发生,4例患者死于充血性心力衰竭(EPI组3例,ENDO组1例)。随访期间,25例EPI组患者中有15例(60%)发生875次自发性心律失常事件(AE),42例ENDO组患者中有28例(67%)发生652次(P=无显著性差异)。心室率≥222次/分钟的室性心动过速或心室颤动在EPI组占167次AE(19%),在ENDO组占182次AE(28%),首次电击终止率分别为76%和75%。心室率<222次/分钟的室性心动过速共1178次AE,EPI导联系统在708次AE中有660次(93%)抗心动过速起搏成功,ENDO导联系统在470次AE中有414次(88%)成功(P=无显著性差异)。因此,采用Cadence V-100的非开胸方法安全有效,临床结果与心外膜除颤导联系统无显著差异。