Turpin D L, Woloshyn H
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(1):13-22. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0013:TPWSDM>2.0.CO;2.
The patient with a severely displaced maxillary canine continues to challenge the orthodontic specialist. When the two patients in the following case reports presented, their problems seemed similar: each had a palatally displaced canine. However, unique clinical problems were soon diagnosed that led to the development of different treatment approaches. These differences are worth discussing, especially in light of newly published studies. In planning treatment for these two patients, the following questions are worth considering. 1. Is it common for other dental anomalies (small lateral incisors, missing teeth) to occur more frequently in patients with palatally displaced canines? 2. Following surgical exposure of palatally displaced maxillary canines, how significant are the risks of tooth movement with regard to periodontal health, vitality, and retention? 3. Are new or improved surgical procedures becoming available to bring severely impacted teeth into alignment? 4. When planning ahead to replace a missing premolar with an endosseous implant, is it better to retain the primary molar as long as possible or extract it during treatment? 5. How stable is the closure of a maxillary median diastema years after a reasonable period of retention?
患有严重移位上颌尖牙的患者仍然是正畸专家面临的挑战。在以下病例报告中的两位患者就诊时,他们的问题似乎相似:两人都有腭侧移位的尖牙。然而,很快就诊断出了独特的临床问题,这导致了不同治疗方法的产生。这些差异值得探讨,尤其是鉴于新发表的研究。在为这两位患者制定治疗计划时,以下问题值得考虑。1. 在腭侧移位尖牙的患者中,其他牙齿异常(侧切牙过小、牙齿缺失)更频繁出现是否常见?2. 对上颌腭侧移位尖牙进行手术暴露后,牙齿移动在牙周健康、活力和固位方面的风险有多大?3. 是否有新的或改进的外科手术方法可用于使严重阻生的牙齿排齐?4. 在计划用骨内种植体替代缺失的前磨牙时,是尽可能长时间保留乳牙磨牙还是在治疗期间拔除更好?5. 在合理的保持期过后数年,上颌正中牙间隙的关闭有多稳定?