Suppr超能文献

头孢吡肟与头孢他啶治疗革兰阴性菌血症住院患者的随机对照研究。

Randomized comparison of cefepime and ceftazidime for treatment of hospitalized patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

作者信息

Schrank J H, Kelly J W, McAllister C K

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas 78234.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jan;20(1):56-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.1.56.

Abstract

We conducted a randomized, prospective, open comparison to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime and ceftazidime in the treatment of hospitalized patients with suspected gram-negative bacteremia. Twenty-eight patients with signs and symptoms of sepsis were prospectively randomized to receive cefepime (13 patients) or ceftazidime (15 patients). Cultures of blood obtained at entry into the study were positive for 24 (85.7%) of 28 patients. Eight patients had two or more positive pretreatment blood cultures, and the remaining 16 had one positive pretreatment blood culture. The most commonly isolated blood pathogen was Escherichia coli. Eleven of 13 patients treated with cefepime and 12 of 15 patients treated with ceftazidime were clinically cured. Adverse effects attributable to therapy with the study drugs were minimal in both groups of patients and included rash, headache, nausea, and diarrhea. Our results suggest that cefepime is an efficacious and well tolerated as is ceftazidime in the treatment of hospitalized patients with documented gram-negative bacteremia.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机、前瞻性、开放性比较研究,以评估头孢吡肟和头孢他啶治疗疑似革兰阴性菌血症住院患者的疗效和安全性。28例有败血症体征和症状的患者被前瞻性随机分为两组,分别接受头孢吡肟治疗(13例)或头孢他啶治疗(15例)。研究开始时采集的血培养标本中,28例患者中有24例(85.7%)呈阳性。8例患者的治疗前血培养有两个或更多阳性结果,其余16例患者有一个阳性治疗前血培养结果。最常分离出的血液病原体是大肠杆菌。接受头孢吡肟治疗的13例患者中有11例临床治愈,接受头孢他啶治疗的15例患者中有12例临床治愈。两组患者中由研究药物治疗引起的不良反应均很少,包括皮疹、头痛、恶心和腹泻。我们的结果表明,在治疗有革兰阴性菌血症记录的住院患者方面,头孢吡肟与头孢他啶一样有效且耐受性良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验