• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评判儿童癌症替代治疗方法的伦理问题。

Ethical aspects of judging the alternative treatment of children with cancer.

作者信息

Enskär K

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 1995 Mar;2(1):51-62. doi: 10.1177/096973309500200107.

DOI:10.1177/096973309500200107
PMID:7728556
Abstract

In recent decades the improved treatment of childhood cancer has increased the proportion of children being cured. However, the intensive treatment required also implies a heavy burden for the children and their families. The purpose of this article is to judge the ethical aspects of different treatment regimens used for children with cancer by means of a case study. The analysis is based on the ethical model by Beauchamp and Childress. The assessment is based on every person, or group of persons, involved and is on the principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice. The analysis shows that intensification of treatment of children with cancer is ethically justified from a deontological point of view. The consequences are more difficult to anticipate from a utilitarian perspective.

摘要

近几十年来,儿童癌症治疗水平的提高增加了治愈儿童的比例。然而,所需的强化治疗对儿童及其家庭来说也是沉重的负担。本文旨在通过一个案例研究来评判用于癌症儿童的不同治疗方案的伦理问题。该分析基于博尚和奇尔德雷斯的伦理模型。评估基于每一个涉及的个人或人群,并依据自主、不伤害、行善和公正的原则。分析表明,从道义论的角度来看,强化癌症儿童的治疗在伦理上是合理的。从功利主义的角度来看,后果则更难预测。

相似文献

1
Ethical aspects of judging the alternative treatment of children with cancer.评判儿童癌症替代治疗方法的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 1995 Mar;2(1):51-62. doi: 10.1177/096973309500200107.
2
Ethical principles in pain management.疼痛管理中的伦理原则。
Pain Med. 2000 Sep;1(3):274-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.00031.x.
3
Ethical principles: application to an obstetric case.伦理原则:在产科病例中的应用
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1989 May-Jun;18(3):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1989.tb00481.x.
4
Ethical principles influencing parents of well children.影响健康儿童家长的伦理原则。
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 1991 Apr-Jun;14(2):93-101. doi: 10.3109/01460869109009755.
5
When four principles are too many: bloodgate, integrity and an action-guiding model of ethical decision making in clinical practice.当四项原则太多时:血液门、诚信和临床实践中伦理决策的行动导向模型。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Apr;38(4):195-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100136. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
6
Ethical conflicts in placebo treatment.安慰剂治疗中的伦理冲突。
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Aug;16(8):947-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01799.x.
7
Age-based limitation for ICU care: is it ethical?重症监护病房(ICU)护理的年龄限制:这符合伦理道德吗?
Crit Care Nurse. 1995 Dec;15(6):65-73.
8
Ethical principles and concepts in medicine.医学中的伦理原则与概念。
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;118:1-9. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00001-9.
9
Solving ethical dilemmas in nursing practice.解决护理实践中的伦理困境。
Top Clin Nurs. 1982 Apr;4(2):15-21.
10
Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care.伦理理论、民族志以及医生和护士在患者护理方法上的差异。
J Med Ethics. 1996 Oct;22(5):292-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.5.292.