McVeigh G E, Flack J, Grimm R
Department of General and Preventive Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Drugs. 1995 Feb;49(2):161-75. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549020-00002.
Antihypertensive therapy has been used for almost 40 years to reduce blood pressure and to prevent morbidity and mortality related to the hypertensive state. Cardiovascular events are related to the initial elevation of blood pressure; the benefits of treating malignant, severe or moderate hypertension are well established. Although large scale clinical trials have demonstrated a decrease in morbid events when mildly elevated blood pressures is treated, the benefits are neither universal or dramatic and treatment is certainly less cost effective than no treatment. Recently it has been emphasised that the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is determined only in part by blood pressure, and that it is also influenced by age, gender, race and the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors. For example, in older individuals where the absolute risk of vascular complications is greater than in younger individuals for any given level of blood pressure, the benefits of therapy will be greater. It has been suggested that in younger individuals with mild hypertension and a low absolute risk of developing cardiovascular morbid events it may be more appropriate to monitor the effects of drug therapy on measures of cardiac and vascular damage that are associated with the hypertensive state. Drug therapy has been shown to be extremely effective in reducing the incidence of stroke, congestive cardiac failure and renal failure associated with elevated blood pressure. Meta-analysis of randomised large scale clinical trials indicates that drug therapy may not reduce coronary events to the extent expected in patients with hypertension. One plausible explanation is that the trials have been of insufficient duration to detect the benefit of blood pressure lowering on coronary heart disease. It has also been suggested that certain adverse metabolic effects associated with the use of thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers employed in these trials may have partially offset the benefits of blood pressure reduction. However, the clinical significance of these drug-induced metabolic disturbances remains unclear. Experimental data suggesting differences in the ability of antihypertensive drugs to inhibit atherosclerosis in animal models are also of interest, but again the relation of the findings to the clinical situation is unknown. Thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and alpha-blockers can produce regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). While LVH is clearly a strong and independent predictor for coronary disease, it remains to be shown that a lower risk for coronary morbid events exists in patients whose LVH has undergone regression over and above that attributable to blood pressure reduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
抗高血压治疗已应用近40年,用于降低血压并预防与高血压状态相关的发病率和死亡率。心血管事件与血压的初始升高有关;治疗恶性、重度或中度高血压的益处已得到充分证实。尽管大规模临床试验表明,治疗轻度高血压可降低发病事件,但益处并非普遍或显著,而且治疗的成本效益肯定低于不治疗。最近有人强调,心血管事件的绝对风险仅部分由血压决定,还受年龄、性别、种族以及其他心血管危险因素的影响。例如,在任何给定血压水平下,老年个体发生血管并发症的绝对风险高于年轻个体,治疗的益处也会更大。有人建议,对于轻度高血压且发生心血管发病事件绝对风险较低的年轻个体,监测药物治疗对与高血压状态相关的心脏和血管损伤指标的影响可能更为合适。药物治疗已被证明在降低与高血压相关的中风、充血性心力衰竭和肾衰竭发病率方面极为有效。对随机大规模临床试验的荟萃分析表明,药物治疗可能无法将高血压患者的冠状动脉事件降低到预期程度。一个合理的解释是,试验持续时间不足,无法检测到降低血压对冠心病的益处。也有人认为,这些试验中使用的噻嗪类利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂相关的某些不良代谢效应可能部分抵消了血压降低的益处。然而,这些药物引起的代谢紊乱的临床意义仍不清楚。实验数据表明,抗高血压药物在动物模型中抑制动脉粥样硬化的能力存在差异,这也很有意思,但同样,这些发现与临床情况的关系尚不清楚。噻嗪类利尿剂、β受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂、血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和α受体阻滞剂可使左心室肥厚(LVH)消退。虽然LVH显然是冠心病的一个强有力的独立预测因素,但LVH消退的患者,其冠状动脉发病事件风险是否低于因血压降低所致的风险,仍有待证明。(摘要截断于400字)