• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理中压疮预防的成本。

Cost of pressure ulcer prevention in long-term care.

作者信息

Xakellis G C, Frantz R, Lewis A

机构信息

John Deere Health Care, Moline, Illinois 61265, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 May;43(5):496-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06095.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06095.x
PMID:7730530
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the total cost of pressure ulcer prevention, component costs of each intervention, and the relationship of costs to subjects' risk level.

DESIGN

3-month cohort trial.

SETTING

A 600-bed, state-supported, long-term care facility.

PATIENTS

A total of 539 war veterans, 83% of whom were male; mean age was 73 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost to facility for using each of four preventive interventions: turning, pressure-reducing mattresses, chair cushions, miscellaneous preventive devices.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight percent of subjects received a preventive intervention. Total 3-month facility cost of prevention was $132,114, and 97% of the cost was consumed by 30% of the subjects. Turning was the most expensive component, accounting for $99,567. The daily cost of turning for subjects who received it was $8.83 +/- 1.66. Cost increased with subject risk level. Low cost devices were instituted for lower risk subjects, whereas high cost interventions (turning) were reserved for the highest risk subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term care facility expended substantial resources on prevention, and most resources (97%) were expended on less than half (30%) of subjects. Turning was, by far, the most expensive intervention, and the nursing staff reserved it for highest risk subjects. Strategies that substitute moderately priced mattresses for frequent turning may decrease the cost of prevention, as long as mattress cost is less than the daily turning costs it replaces. Future research to define the optimum combinations of preventive interventions for patients of various risk levels is needed.

摘要

目的

描述压疮预防的总成本、每种干预措施的组成成本以及成本与受试者风险水平的关系。

设计

为期3个月的队列试验。

地点

一家拥有600张床位、由州政府资助的长期护理机构。

患者

共有539名退伍军人,其中83%为男性;平均年龄为73岁。

主要观察指标

使用四种预防干预措施(翻身、减压床垫、椅垫、其他预防设备)对机构造成的成本。

结果

68%的受试者接受了预防干预。3个月的预防总费用为132,114美元,其中97%的费用由30%的受试者产生。翻身是最昂贵的组成部分,占99,567美元。接受翻身干预的受试者每天的费用为8.83±1.66美元。成本随受试者风险水平增加。低风险受试者采用低成本设备,而高成本干预措施(翻身)则用于风险最高的受试者。

结论

这家长期护理机构在预防方面投入了大量资源,且大部分资源(97%)用于不到一半(30%)的受试者身上。到目前为止,翻身是最昂贵的干预措施,护理人员将其用于风险最高的受试者。只要床垫成本低于其所替代的每日翻身成本,用价格适中的床垫替代频繁翻身的策略可能会降低预防成本。未来需要开展研究来确定针对不同风险水平患者的最佳预防干预措施组合。

相似文献

1
Cost of pressure ulcer prevention in long-term care.长期护理中压疮预防的成本。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 May;43(5):496-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06095.x.
2
Nursing assessment: impact on type and cost of interventions to prevent pressure ulcers.护理评估:对预防压疮干预措施的类型和成本的影响
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 1998 Nov;25(6):273-80. doi: 10.1016/s1071-5754(98)90024-9.
3
A comprehensive program to prevent pressure ulcers in long-term care: exploring costs and outcomes.一项预防长期护理中压疮的综合计划:探索成本与结果。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2002 Apr;48(4):52-62.
4
Cost-effectiveness of an intensive pressure ulcer prevention protocol in long-term care.长期护理中强化压疮预防方案的成本效益
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Jan-Feb;11(1):22-9.
5
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program Study: a randomized, controlled prospective comparative value evaluation of 2 pressure ulcer prevention strategies in nursing and rehabilitation centers.压力性溃疡预防计划研究:对护理和康复中心 2 种压力性溃疡预防策略的随机、对照、前瞻性比较价值评估。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Oct;25(10):450-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000421461.21773.32.
6
The cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing pressure ulcers.预防压疮干预措施的成本效益
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996 Mar-Apr;9(2):79-85.
7
Translating pressure ulcer guidelines into practice: it's harder than it sounds.将压疮指南付诸实践:这比听起来要难得多。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2001 Sep-Oct;14(5):249-56, 258. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200109000-00012.
8
A comparison of patient risk for pressure ulcer development with nursing use of preventive interventions.患者发生压疮风险与护理预防性干预措施使用情况的比较。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992 Dec;40(12):1250-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb03651.x.
9
[Less frequent turning intervals and yet less pressure ulcers].
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2001 Aug;32(4):174-7.
10
Integration of pressure ulcer treatment protocol into practice: clinical outcomes and care environment attributes.将压疮治疗方案融入实践:临床结果与护理环境属性
Outcomes Manag Nurs Pract. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):112-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of training programmes on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries: A meta-analysis.训练计划对护士照顾压力性损伤患者能力的影响:荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):262-271. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13627. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Two-Hourly Repositioning for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in the Elderly: Patient Safety or Elder Abuse?每两小时翻身一次预防老年人压疮:是患者安全还是虐待老人?
J Bioeth Inq. 2019 Mar;16(1):17-34. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9892-3. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Effects of a continuous lateral turning device on pressure relief.
连续侧向翻转装置对减压的影响。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(2):460-6. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.460. Epub 2016 Feb 29.