Musham C, Darr E G, Strossner M L
Environmental Hazards Assessment Program (EHAP), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-8017, USA.
J Fam Pract. 1995 May;40(5):465-70.
The purpose of this study was to examine specific factors that motivated the request for early removal of Norplant among a group of young, low-income women who were dissatisfied with this contraceptive method.
Focus groups were conducted to obtain qualitative in-depth attitude and opinion data about Norplant from women who had used this method of contraception for a period ranging from 2 months to 25 months and had requested its removal because of side effects.
Patient motivation for requesting Norplant removal was based on side effects. No other reason for early removal requests emerged from the focus group discussions. However, the comments of many participants raised questions about the psychosocial context in which patients obtain information about Norplant and request early removal. Many participants mentioned having felt pressured to accept Norplant and not being fully informed about possible side effects. All but two said they were encouraged to "wait out" side effects and that physicians were reluctant to remove the Norplant capsules. Many participants recalled that they had to request removal several times before their physicians complied with their wishes.
The results of this study suggest that there is a need to review the process of educating patients about Norplant, the situational context of Norplant counseling, and physician practices related to patients' requests for early removal.
本研究的目的是调查促使一组年轻低收入女性要求提前取出诺普兰(皮下埋植避孕剂)的具体因素,这些女性对这种避孕方法不满意。
开展焦点小组讨论,以获取使用这种避孕方法2个月至25个月且因副作用要求取出的女性关于诺普兰的定性深入态度和意见数据。
患者要求取出诺普兰的动机基于副作用。焦点小组讨论未出现其他要求提前取出的原因。然而,许多参与者的评论引发了关于患者获取诺普兰信息并要求提前取出的社会心理背景的问题。许多参与者提到在接受诺普兰时感到有压力,且未充分了解可能的副作用。除两人外,所有人都说她们被鼓励“挺过”副作用,而且医生不愿意取出诺普兰胶囊。许多参与者回忆说,她们不得不多次要求取出,医生才会照她们的意愿行事。
本研究结果表明,有必要审查对患者进行诺普兰教育的过程、诺普兰咨询的情境以及与患者要求提前取出相关的医生做法。