Kalmuss D, Davidson A R, Cushman L F, Heartwell S, Rulin M
Center for Population and Family Health, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(6):256-60.
The determinants of contraceptive implant discontinuation within six months of insertion were examined among 786 low-income women attending family planning clinics in three U.S. cities. The six-month cumulative life-table discontinuation rate was 7.6%. Menstrual side effects were the most common reasons given for early implant removal, although women who discontinued use were no more likely than those who continued with the method to report menstrual irregularities. Women who opted for early removal were more likely than those who continued with the method to experience headaches, hair loss, weight gain and arm infection. Logistic regression analysis indicates that dissatisfaction with prior contraceptive methods, a partner who wants a child within the next two years, perceived pressure from health care providers to choose the implant, exposure to negative media coverage and the number of implant side effects significantly predict early implant discontinuation. Women's social and demographic characteristics, Medicaid status and motivation to avoid an unplanned pregnancy were not significantly related to early removal.
在美国三个城市的计划生育诊所就诊的786名低收入女性中,研究了避孕植入物在插入后六个月内停用的决定因素。六个月累积生命表停用率为7.6%。月经副作用是早期取出植入物最常见的原因,尽管停用该方法的女性报告月经不规律的可能性并不比继续使用该方法的女性更高。选择早期取出的女性比继续使用该方法的女性更容易出现头痛、脱发、体重增加和手臂感染。逻辑回归分析表明,对先前避孕方法的不满、伴侣希望在未来两年内生育、感觉到医疗保健提供者选择植入物的压力、接触负面媒体报道以及植入物副作用的数量显著预测早期植入物停用。女性的社会和人口特征、医疗补助状态以及避免意外怀孕的动机与早期取出没有显著关系。