Suppr超能文献

加拿大立法、判例法及法律学说中的死亡权。

The right to die in Canadian legislation, case law and legal doctrine.

作者信息

Plachta M

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Med Law. 1994;13(7-8):639-80.

PMID:7731350
Abstract

This article discusses moral, social, medical and legal problems pertaining to the so-called 'right to die' from the perspective of Canadian criminal legislation (the Criminal Code), constitutional law (the Charter of Rights and Freedoms) and court rulings. Regarding the latter, the opinions delivered in Nancy B v Hôtel-Dieu de Quebec and Rodriguez v British Columbia (Attorney General) are especially significant. In Rodriguez, the Supreme Court of British Columbia unequivocally rejected the petitioner's submission that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right to die. This judgment was upheld on appeal by both the British Columbia Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada. In addition, the article addresses the complex problem of legislating the right to die in Canada. Several options are examined, such as professional judgment and advance health care directives including living wills and powers of attorney for health care. In this context, the recommendations adopted by both the Law Reform Commission of Canada and provincial commissions are analysed. Finally, the article discusses the legislation proposed recently in Alberta, Manitoba, Newfoundland, Ontario and Saskatchewan. It seems doubtful, however, whether a nation-wide solution will be found in the near future.

摘要

本文从加拿大刑法(《刑法典》)、宪法(《权利和自由宪章》)及法院裁决的角度,探讨了与所谓“死亡权”相关的道德、社会、医学及法律问题。关于后者,在“南希·B诉魁北克省迪厄医院案”及“罗德里格斯诉不列颠哥伦比亚省(总检察长)案”中作出的判决尤为重要。在“罗德里格斯案”中,不列颠哥伦比亚省最高法院明确驳回了请愿人提出的《权利和自由宪章》保障死亡权的主张。不列颠哥伦比亚省上诉法院和加拿大最高法院在上诉中维持了这一判决。此外,本文还探讨了加拿大死亡权立法这一复杂问题。文中研究了多种选项,如专业判断以及包括生前遗嘱和医疗保健委托书在内的预先医疗保健指示。在此背景下,分析了加拿大法律改革委员会和省级委员会采纳的建议。最后,本文讨论了艾伯塔省、马尼托巴省、纽芬兰省、安大略省和萨斯喀彻温省最近提议的立法。然而,近期是否能找到全国性的解决方案仍存疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验