• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

良性、发育异常或恶性——解读内镜下胆管刷检细胞学检查结果:149例连续患者的结果

Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Lee J G, Leung J W, Baillie J, Layfield L J, Cotton P B

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 May;90(5):722-6.

PMID:7733076
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology for diagnosis of pancreaticobiliary malignancies and to provide guidelines for interpretation of dysplastic cytology.

METHODS

Consecutive endoscopic bile duct brush cytology specimens were classified by an independent cytopathologist as benign, low- or high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. A final diagnosis was established in a blinded fashion by histopathology, radiographic evidence of metastatic disease, or independent clinical follow-up. Sensitivity and specificity were adjusted for dysplastic cytology, and likelihood ratios were determined for each diagnosis and used for calculation of posttest probability of malignancy.

RESULTS

Dysplasia was found in 23% of 168 consecutive bile duct brushings performed in 149 patients. Sensitivity of brush cytology was 37% and specificity 100%; its likelihood ratio for malignancy ranged from 3.4 for high-grade dysplasia, to 1.1 for low-grade dysplasia, to 0.6 for benign. For a patient with a 50% pretest probability of malignancy, finding of high-grade dysplasia changed the posttest probability to 77%, low-grade dysplasia to 52%, and benign to 38%.

CONCLUSION

Cytological dysplasia occurs frequently, with high-grade dysplasia being strongly suggestive of malignancy. Presented likelihood ratios can be used to calculate the posttest probability of malignancy for any diagnosis.

摘要

目的

确定内镜下胆管刷检细胞学检查对胰胆恶性肿瘤的诊断效能,并为发育异常细胞学的解读提供指导原则。

方法

由一名独立的细胞病理学家将连续的内镜下胆管刷检标本分类为良性、低级别或高级别发育异常或癌症。通过组织病理学、转移性疾病的影像学证据或独立的临床随访以盲法方式确立最终诊断。针对发育异常细胞学对敏感性和特异性进行调整,并确定每种诊断的似然比,用于计算恶性肿瘤的检验后概率。

结果

在149例患者进行的168次连续胆管刷检中,23%发现有发育异常。刷检细胞学的敏感性为37%,特异性为100%;其恶性肿瘤的似然比范围从高级别发育异常的3.4到低级别发育异常的1.1,再到良性的0.6。对于一名恶性肿瘤检验前概率为50%的患者,发现高级别发育异常将检验后概率变为77%,低级别发育异常变为52%,良性变为38%。

结论

细胞学发育异常经常发生,高级别发育异常强烈提示恶性肿瘤。所呈现的似然比可用于计算任何诊断的恶性肿瘤检验后概率。

相似文献

1
Benign, dysplastic, or malignant--making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients.良性、发育异常或恶性——解读内镜下胆管刷检细胞学检查结果:149例连续患者的结果
Am J Gastroenterol. 1995 May;90(5):722-6.
2
Diagnostic benefit of biliary brush cytology in cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.原发性硬化性胆管炎中胆管癌的胆汁刷检细胞学诊断价值
J Hepatol. 2006 Oct;45(4):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jun 21.
3
A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures.常规细胞学检查与荧光原位杂交技术在检测恶性胆管狭窄中的比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1675-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30281.x.
4
Effectiveness of a new long cytology brush in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study.一种新型长细胞学刷在恶性胆道梗阻评估中的有效性:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan;63(1):71-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.08.039.
5
Biliary brush cytology for the diagnosis of malignancy: a single center experience.用于诊断恶性肿瘤的胆管刷检细胞学:单中心经验
Coll Antropol. 2010 Mar;34(1):139-43.
6
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation.内镜逆行胰胆管造影、胆管内超声检查及磁共振胰胆管造影在胆管狭窄中的应用:影像学诊断与组织病理学相关性的前瞻性比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30347.x.
7
Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中胆管狭窄刷检细胞学的前瞻性评估
Endoscopy. 1999 Nov;31(9):712-7. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-73.
8
A prospective, controlled analysis of endoscopic cytotechniques for diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures.一项关于内镜细胞学技术诊断恶性胆管狭窄的前瞻性对照分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1991 May;86(5):577-80.
9
Diagnosis of biliary strictures in conjunction with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography, with special reference to patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis.结合内镜逆行胰胆管造影术诊断胆管狭窄,特别提及原发性硬化性胆管炎患者。
Endoscopy. 2002 Nov;34(11):909-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35298.
10
A prospective randomised study of dense Infinity cytological brush versus regularly used brush in pancreaticobiliary malignancy.致密型Infinity细胞刷与常规使用的刷子在胰胆恶性肿瘤中的前瞻性随机研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(5):590-3. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1121514. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Dysbiosis of the duodenal microbiota as a diagnostic marker for pancreaticobiliary cancer.十二指肠微生物群失调作为胰胆管癌的诊断标志物
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):2088-2100. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i12.2088.
2
Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间的最佳组织采样以及用于鉴别良恶性胆管狭窄的新兴分子技术。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Apr 15;14:17562848211002023. doi: 10.1177/17562848211002023. eCollection 2021.
3
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided interventions in the management of pancreatic cancer.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术指导下的干预措施在胰腺癌治疗中的应用
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct 16;12(10):323-340. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v12.i10.323.
4
Appropriate number of biliary biopsies and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography sessions for diagnosing biliary tract cancer.用于诊断胆管癌的适当胆管活检数量和内镜逆行胰胆管造影检查次数
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar 16;11(3):231-238. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.231.
5
The efficacy of serum cell death biomarkers for diagnosing biliary tract cancer.血清细胞死亡生物标志物在诊断胆道癌中的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 19;8(1):16997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35278-7.
6
Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Bile Cytology Using a Newly Designed Biliary Scraper for Biliary Strictures.经新型胆管刷采集的胆汁细胞学检查对胆管狭窄的诊断能力。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Jan;64(1):241-248. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5217-y. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
7
EUS-FNA versus ERCP for tissue diagnosis of suspect malignant biliary strictures: a prospective comparative study.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺活检与内镜逆行胰胆管造影用于可疑恶性胆管狭窄组织诊断的前瞻性对照研究
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Jun;6(6):E769-E777. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-123186. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
8
Comparison of biliary brush biopsy and fine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of biliary strictures.胆管刷检活检与细针穿刺活检在胆管狭窄诊断中的比较。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2018 Oct;27(5):278-283. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1427597. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
9
Agreement between endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and endobiliary brush cytology in suspected pancreaticobiliary malignancies.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺与内镜下胆管刷检细胞学检查在疑似胰胆管恶性肿瘤中的一致性
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Dec;5(12):E1251-E1258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-119754. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
The efficacy of biliary and serum macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 for diagnosing biliary tract cancer.胆管和血清巨噬细胞抑制因子-1 对诊断胆管癌的疗效。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 23;7(1):9198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09740-x.