Gerdes H, Chen Q, Elahi A H, Sircar A, Goldberg E, Winawer D, Urmacher C, Winawer S J, Jhanwar S C
Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Anticancer Res. 1995 Jan-Feb;15(1):13-24.
We have employed cytogenetic and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis to identify a full spectrum of cytogenetic and molecular alterations associated with initiation and progression of "sporadic" colorectal cancer and also to correlate the alterations with biological and clinical behavior of the tumors. The study series included 63 colorectal cancers, 47 primary and 16 metastatic recurrences. Cytogenetic analysis was successful in 48 tumors (76%) of which 44 (91%) were abnormal. Of these 44 tumors, clonal abnormalities were identified in 43, whereas chromosomes from one tumor were unsuitable for complete analysis. Each of these abnormal tumors displayed heterogeneity with regard to extent and complexity of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities. Numerical losses of chromosomes 17 and 18 (20-34%) and gains of chromosome 7 (28%) were significantly higher. The four most frequent structural rearrangements on the other hand, involved specific regions of chromosomes 1p, 5q, 17p, and 18q. The shortest regions of overlap of these rearrangements or losses were located at 1p36, 5q21-22, 17p13 and 18q21- > ter. RFLP analysis directed at 1p, 5q, 17p and 18q identified allelic deletions of these regions in 39 tumors (64%) which included 17 normal and 11 cytogenetic failures. Of all the informative tumors, 32%, 37%, 31%, and 63% showed allelic losses at chromosomes 1p, 5q, 17p and 18q respectively. The two methods of analysis (cytogenetics and RFLP) employed to identify genetic alterations were complementary; probes for chromosome 1 and 18 showed the greatest degree of concordance, whereas probes for chromosomes 5 and 17 provided relatively higher rate of discordance with cytogenetic results. These differences could be attributed mainly to three reasons: 1) a limited number of probes used for RFLP analysis; 2) contamination of tumor cells with normal cells, and 3) either mutational inactivation or deletion of specific alleles not closely linked to the probes used. Regardless of these limitations, however, the combined use of cytogenetic and RFLP identified genetic alterations in a large number of tumors and help elucidate the role of hyperdiploidy and/or relative deficiency of a given chromosomal segment in expression of recessive mutations. In addition, alterations of either chromosomes 1 or 17 predicted poorer survival for the patients with primary colorectal cancer (p = 0.03).
我们运用细胞遗传学和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析来识别与“散发性”结直肠癌的发生和进展相关的一系列细胞遗传学和分子改变,并将这些改变与肿瘤的生物学和临床行为相关联。研究系列包括63例结直肠癌,其中47例为原发性肿瘤,16例为转移性复发肿瘤。细胞遗传学分析在48例肿瘤(76%)中成功完成,其中44例(91%)存在异常。在这44例肿瘤中,43例鉴定出克隆异常,而有1例肿瘤的染色体不适合进行完整分析。这些异常肿瘤中的每一个在复发性染色体异常的程度和复杂性方面都表现出异质性。染色体17和18的数目缺失(20 - 34%)以及染色体7的增加(28%)显著更高。另一方面,四种最常见的结构重排涉及染色体1p、5q、17p和18q的特定区域。这些重排或缺失的最短重叠区域位于1p36、5q21 - 22、17p13和18q21 - >末端。针对1p、5q、17p和18q的RFLP分析在39例肿瘤(64%)中鉴定出这些区域的等位基因缺失,其中包括17例正常肿瘤和11例细胞遗传学分析失败的肿瘤。在所有可提供信息的肿瘤中,分别有32%、37%、31%和63%在染色体1p、5q、17p和18q上显示出等位基因缺失。用于识别基因改变的两种分析方法(细胞遗传学和RFLP)是互补的;染色体1和18的探针显示出最高程度的一致性,而染色体5和17的探针与细胞遗传学结果的不一致率相对较高。这些差异主要可归因于三个原因:1)用于RFLP分析的探针数量有限;2)肿瘤细胞被正常细胞污染;3)特定等位基因的突变失活或缺失,这些等位基因与所使用的探针没有紧密连锁。然而,尽管存在这些局限性,细胞遗传学和RFLP的联合使用在大量肿瘤中识别出了基因改变,并有助于阐明超二倍体和/或特定染色体片段的相对缺失在隐性突变表达中的作用。此外,染色体1或17的改变预示着原发性结直肠癌患者的生存率较低(p = 0.03)。