Normand J P, Legendre M, Kahn J C, Bourdarias J P, Mathivat A
Br Heart J. 1976 Apr;38(4):381-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.38.4.381.
Forty patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, apparently unrelated to any overt heart disease, were randomly allocated to two groups after restoration of sinus rhythm by direct current shock. The patients in group A were given 4 daily doses of quinidine polygalacturonate, while those in group B were given 2 daily doses of a long-acting quinidine preparation, quinidine arabogalactan sulphate. The percentage of early relapses (within the first month following DC shock) was not significantly different in the two groups: 44-4% in group A and 35% in group B (P greater than 0-50). On the other hand, there were fewer late relapses with long-acting quinidine. After 18 months of treatment, 27-8% of patient in group A remained in sinus rhythm, compared with 61% in group B (P less than 0-05). The average amount of quinidine actually ingested by the patients in group A was smaller than that in group B. However, this could not entirely account for the difference observed in the incidence of relapse since with short-acting quinidine the proportion of patients remaining in sinu rhythm was similar whether the dose was decreased or not. The incidence of gastrointestinal side-effects was the same in the two groups and there were no seriou complications that could be attributed to treatment. It is concluded that long-acting quinidine preparations are more effective than conventional quinidine in preventing late relapses of atrial fibrillation.
40例明显与任何显性心脏病无关的慢性心房颤动患者,在通过直流电电击恢复窦性心律后被随机分为两组。A组患者每日服用4剂聚半乳糖醛酸奎尼丁,而B组患者每日服用2剂长效奎尼丁制剂硫酸阿拉伯半乳聚糖奎尼丁。两组早期复发(直流电电击后第一个月内)的百分比无显著差异:A组为44.4%,B组为35%(P大于0.50)。另一方面,长效奎尼丁的晚期复发较少。治疗18个月后,A组27.8%的患者维持窦性心律,而B组为61%(P小于0.05)。A组患者实际摄入的奎尼丁平均量低于B组。然而,这并不能完全解释复发率观察到的差异,因为使用短效奎尼丁时,无论剂量是否减少,维持窦性心律的患者比例相似。两组胃肠道副作用的发生率相同,且没有可归因于治疗的严重并发症。结论是,长效奎尼丁制剂在预防心房颤动晚期复发方面比传统奎尼丁更有效。