Solomon P R, Barth C L, Wood M S, Velazquez E, Groccia-Ellison M, Yang B Y
Department of Psychology, Williams College, Williamstown, Massachusetts 01267, USA.
Behav Neurosci. 1995 Feb;109(1):18-23. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.109.1.18.
Young and aged rabbits underwent classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane response (NMR) to a tone conditioned stimulus (CS) and a corneal airpuff unconditioned stimulus (UCS) for 18 consecutive days. Rabbits were then returned to their home cages for a 90-day period in which they received no further conditioning, but they were handled daily. On Day 91 they underwent retention testing during which the CS alone was presented 20 times. This was immediately followed by reacquisition in which the CS and UCS were again paired for 100 trials. Reacquisition was repeated on the following day. As in previous studies, aged rabbits acquired the conditioned response (CR) more slowly than young rabbits; however, by the end of acquisition, both groups reached similar asymptotic levels. Retention of the CR was significantly lower for aged than young rabbits. Reacquisition was also retarded in aged vs. young rabbits. Nonassociative factors, such as sensitivity to the stimuli or general health, could not account for these differences. Data are discussed in terms of using retention of the conditioned eyeblink response as a model system for studying age-related memory deficits.
