• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术说明:超声测量喙锁间距——一种新技术。

Technical note: measuring the coracoclavicular distance with ultrasound--a new technique.

作者信息

Sluming V A

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiography, University of Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 1995 Feb;68(806):189-93. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-806-189.

DOI:10.1259/0007-1285-68-806-189
PMID:7735749
Abstract

The distance between the clavicle and the coracoid process of the scapula is frequently assessed during the radiographic investigation of the acromioclavicular joint. This study defines an ultrasound technique (5 MHz real time linear array) for measuring the coracoclavicular distance, and determines its reliability and validity. A new ultrasonic technique was performed on 49 healthy subjects who had volunteered to participate in the study, having given signed, informed consent. The measuring endpoints for the coracoclavicular distance were the superior border of the clavicle and the superior border of the coracoid process. Three replicate scans were performed on each shoulder. The ultrasound measurements for 19 of the subjects were compared with the measurement obtained from a normal shoulder radiograph (which had previously been requested on clinical grounds). The data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the limits of agreement method of analysis. The mean difference between the radiograph and ultrasound measurements was 0.38 mm. The limits of agreement (95% confidence intervals) were -0.57 (-0.97, -0.17) and 1.33 (0.93, 1.73). Intraoperator and interoperator reliability were evaluated with a multifactor ANOVA and gave p = 0.7 for intraoperator reliability and p = 0.5 for interoperator reliability. The mean of the coefficients of variation for the two operators was 1.84%. The average range for repeated trials (same operator, same subject) was 1.35 mm. The maximum differences in the averages for each operator was 1.2 mm. The ultrasound technique described is a reliable, accurate and valid technique for evaluating the coracoclavicular distance and may usefully supplement the routine radiographic examination of the shoulder in patients presenting for radiographic examination of the acromioclavicular joint.

摘要

在肩锁关节的影像学检查中,经常会评估锁骨与肩胛骨喙突之间的距离。本研究定义了一种用于测量喙锁距离的超声技术(5兆赫实时线性阵列),并确定其可靠性和有效性。对49名自愿参与研究并签署知情同意书的健康受试者进行了一项新的超声技术检测。喙锁距离的测量端点为锁骨上缘和喙突上缘。对每个肩部进行了三次重复扫描。将19名受试者的超声测量结果与从正常肩部X线片(此前因临床原因要求拍摄)获得的测量结果进行了比较。对数据进行了方差分析(ANOVA)和一致性界限分析方法。X线片和超声测量结果之间的平均差异为0.38毫米。一致性界限(95%置信区间)为-0.57(-0.97,-0.17)和1.33(0.93,1.73)。通过多因素方差分析评估了操作者内和操作者间的可靠性,操作者内可靠性的p值为0.7,操作者间可靠性的p值为0.5。两名操作者的变异系数平均值为1.84%。重复试验(同一操作者,同一受试者)的平均范围为1.35毫米。每个操作者平均值的最大差异为1.2毫米。所描述的超声技术是一种可靠、准确且有效的评估喙锁距离的技术,可有效补充因肩锁关节影像学检查而就诊的患者肩部的常规影像学检查。

相似文献

1
Technical note: measuring the coracoclavicular distance with ultrasound--a new technique.技术说明:超声测量喙锁间距——一种新技术。
Br J Radiol. 1995 Feb;68(806):189-93. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-806-189.
2
[Ultrasound evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
Sportverletz Sportschaden. 2005 Dec;19(4):177-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858871.
3
Acute traumatic acromioclavicular joint lesions: role of ultrasound versus conventional radiography.急性创伤性肩锁关节损伤:超声与传统放射摄影的作用
Radiol Med. 2004 Apr;107(4):367-75.
4
Coracoclavicular involvement--an atypical manifestation in rheumatoid arthritis.喙锁关节受累——类风湿关节炎的一种非典型表现。
Scand J Rheumatol. 1999;28(4):252-3. doi: 10.1080/03009749950155634.
5
Interpretation of the shoulder radiograph.肩部X光片解读。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2006 Feb;67(2):M27-9. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2006.67.Sup2.20479.
6
Radiological evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint.肩锁关节的影像学评估。
Skeletal Radiol. 1991;20(2):115-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00193822.
7
The cortical ring sign: a reliable radiographic landmark for percutaneous coracoclavicular fixation.皮质环征:经皮肩锁关节固定的可靠影像学标志。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jan;19(1):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.002.
8
[Shoulder radiographic evaluation. Radiographic examination of shoulder and scapular girdle trauma (author's transl)].[肩部X线评估。肩部及肩胛带创伤的X线检查(作者译)]
J Radiol. 1981 Apr;62(4):247-56.
9
A comparison of the methods of distraction for stress examination of the acromioclavicular joint.肩锁关节应力检查中不同牵引方法的比较
Br J Radiol. 1995 Nov;68(815):1181-4. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-68-815-1181.
10
Axial view radiograph of the shoulder.肩部的轴位X线片。
BMJ. 2012 Oct 19;345:e6861. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6861.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid-term clinical and sonographic outcomes of minimally invasive acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: mini-open versus arthroscopically assisted.微创肩锁关节重建术的中期临床和超声结果:微创切开与关节镜辅助。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Feb;144(2):807-814. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05110-7. Epub 2023 Nov 8.
2
Has the arthroscopically assisted reduction of acute AC joint separations with the double tight-rope technique advantages over the clavicular hook plate fixation?与锁骨钩钢板固定相比,关节镜辅助下采用双袢钢板技术复位急性肩锁关节脱位是否具有优势?
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Feb;22(2):422-30. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-2270-5. Epub 2012 Nov 4.