• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[非开胸食管切除术。回顾性研究与前瞻性随机试验的比较]

[Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Comparison between a retrospective study and a prospective randomized trial].

作者信息

Launois B, Khelif D, Meunier B, Bardaxoglou E, Charetoń B, Landen S, Campion J P

机构信息

Centre de Chirurgie digestive et Unité de Transplantation, Hôpital Pontchaillou, CHU de Rennes.

出版信息

Chirurgie. 1994;120(1):40-6; discussion 47.

PMID:7736844
Abstract

From 1983 to 1989, 96 oesophagectomies (30% of all oesophagectomies performed during this period) were performed without thoracotomy and then analyzed retrospectively. Most were performed due to contraindications including age (17%), respiratory disease (47%), heart disease (37%) or for superficial oesophageal lesions (35% were stage T1). Operative mortality was 3.1%. Fistulization of the anastomosis occurred in 7.5% of the cases. Actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 29% and was independent of age but dependent on localization, the size of the tumour, presence of parietal invasion and TNM classification. However, patient selection introduced bias and a prospective randomized study comparing oesophagectomy without thoracotomy and oesophagectomy via right thoracotomy and midline incision demonstrated that mortality and complications were similar with the two techniques. Long term survival was not dependent on access route, but on the stage of the disease.

摘要

1983年至1989年期间,96例食管切除术(占同期所有食管切除术的30%)在未开胸的情况下进行,随后进行回顾性分析。大多数手术是由于存在禁忌症,包括年龄(17%)、呼吸系统疾病(47%)、心脏病(37%)或因浅表性食管病变(35%为T1期)。手术死亡率为3.1%。吻合口瘘发生率为7.5%。5年实际生存率为29%,与年龄无关,但取决于肿瘤位置、大小、是否存在壁层侵犯以及TNM分类。然而,患者选择存在偏差,一项比较非开胸食管切除术与经右胸和正中切口食管切除术的前瞻性随机研究表明,两种技术的死亡率和并发症相似。长期生存不取决于手术入路,而是取决于疾病分期。

相似文献

1
[Esophagectomy without thoracotomy. Comparison between a retrospective study and a prospective randomized trial].[非开胸食管切除术。回顾性研究与前瞻性随机试验的比较]
Chirurgie. 1994;120(1):40-6; discussion 47.
2
Outcome of oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction.食管及食管胃交界腺癌的食管切除术结果
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Jul;75(7):513-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03433.x.
3
Oesophagectomy without thoracotomy: first 250 patients.非开胸食管切除术:首批250例患者
Eur J Surg. 1996 Jun;162(6):455-61.
4
Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy: complication and survival rates.经裂孔与经胸食管切除术:并发症及生存率
Am Surg. 1999 Dec;65(12):1137-41; discussion 1141-2.
5
Mortality and morbidity after resection for adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: predictive factors.胃食管交界腺癌切除术后的死亡率和发病率:预测因素
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Aug;201(2):253-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.002.
6
[Transmediastinal esophagectomy without thoracotomy in cancer of the esophagus].[经纵隔食管切除术治疗食管癌:不开胸术式]
Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 1990;10(1):14-20.
7
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial.与有限经裂孔切除术相比,扩大经胸段切除术治疗中/远端食管癌的随机临床试验五年生存率
Ann Surg. 2007 Dec;246(6):992-1000; discussion 1000-1. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31815c4037.
8
Changing patterns and surgical results in adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.食管癌腺癌的变化模式与手术结果
Br J Surg. 1997 Jan;84(1):119-25.
9
Predictors of long-term survival after resection of esophageal carcinoma with nonregional nodal metastases.伴有非区域淋巴结转移的食管癌切除术后长期生存的预测因素。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):186-92; discussion 192-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.079.
10
Impact on outcome of the route of conduit transposition after transhiatal oesophagectomy: A randomized controlled trial.经裂孔食管切除术后管道转位途径对预后的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Oct;41(10):711-6. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2009.02.051. Epub 2009 Jul 5.