Kamien M, Ward A M, Mansfield F, Fatovich B, Mather C, Anstey K
Department of General Practice, University of Western Australia, Claremont.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1994 Dec 31;26(3):197-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(94)90061-2.
The purpose of this study was: (1) to record GP opinions, practices and outcomes for the care of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM2), (2) compare practice facilities and process of care with a criterion of recommended competent care and (3) determine if there were any differences between vocationally registered and non-vocationally registered GPs. A random sample of 204 metropolitan doctors from 124 practices was selected and an audit performed on 467 of their patient records. GPs pursued good blood sugar control and advocated lifestyle changes before hypoglycaemic drugs. Over 80% regard uncomplicated DM2 as a condition for general practice management. However, only 15% conducted an annual diabetes check, 9% had a diabetic register, 6% a diabetic recall system and 8% used a diabetic health care checklist for monitoring their patients. The most commonly recorded processes of medical audit in the previous 12 months were: blood pressure (94%), duration of diabetes (72%), blood glucose (70%), diet (66%), body weight (56%), HBA1c (52%) and ophthalmoscopy (50%). The least commonly recorded processes of care were body mass index (5%), inspection of the feet (18%), enquiries about vaginitis or impotence (23%). The amount of exercise, alcohol and tobacco was recorded in only 34% of records. Hypoglycaemic drugs were used appropriately but the most commonly used drugs for treating hypertension in DM2 patients were thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers. Vocationally registered (VR) doctors had better records, higher process of care scores and more were willing to participate in the study than non-vocationally registered (NVR) doctors. However, there was no difference in metabolic control between patients from either group. The use of a Diabetic Health Care Checklist would improve diabetes care especially in the search for early complications and in the recording of HBA1c and other metabolic parameters. The drugs commonly used to control hypertension can have adverse effects on glucose and lipid metabolism and should be replaced with glucose and lipid neutral drugs.
(1)记录全科医生对2型糖尿病(DM2)护理的意见、做法和结果;(2)将实践设施和护理过程与推荐的合格护理标准进行比较;(3)确定职业注册全科医生和非职业注册全科医生之间是否存在差异。从124家诊所中随机抽取了204名城市医生,并对他们的467份患者记录进行了审核。全科医生在使用降糖药物之前,致力于良好的血糖控制并倡导生活方式改变。超过80%的人认为单纯性DM2是一般诊疗管理的疾病。然而,只有15%的人进行年度糖尿病检查,9%的人有糖尿病登记册,6%的人有糖尿病召回系统,8%的人使用糖尿病保健检查表来监测患者。在过去12个月中,最常记录的医疗审核过程是:血压(94%)、糖尿病病程(72%)、血糖(70%)、饮食(出66%)、体重(56%)、糖化血红蛋白(52%)和眼科检查(50%)。最不常记录的护理过程是体重指数(5%)、足部检查(18%)、关于阴道炎或阳痿的询问(23%)。仅34%的记录中记录了运动量、饮酒量和吸烟量。降糖药物使用得当,但DM2患者最常用的治疗高血压的药物是噻嗪类利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂。职业注册(VR)医生的记录更好,护理过程得分更高,并且比非职业注册(NVR)医生更愿意参与研究。然而,两组患者的代谢控制没有差异。使用糖尿病保健检查表将改善糖尿病护理,特别是在寻找早期并发症以及记录糖化血红蛋白和其他代谢参数方面。常用于控制高血压的药物可能对葡萄糖和脂质代谢产生不良影响,应替换为对葡萄糖和脂质无影响的药物。