• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对全科医疗中2型糖尿病患者的质量改进项目的长期效果

Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice.

作者信息

Renders C M, Valk G D, Franse L V, Schellevis F G, van Eijk J T, van der Wal G

机构信息

Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1365-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1365.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.24.8.1365
PMID:11473071
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program on care provided and patient outcomes in patients with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A nonrandomized trial was performed with 312 patients with type 2 diabetes in the intervention group and 77 patients with type 2 diabetes in the reference group. The follow-up period was 42 months. The quality improvement program focused on improving both the provision of diabetes care and the patient outcomes. The program consisted of clinical practice guidelines, postgraduate education, audit and feedback, templates to register diabetes care, and a recall system. Data on the care provided were abstracted from medical records. Main outcomes on the provision of care were annual number of patient visits, blood pressure, and HbA(1c) and blood lipid levels. Main patient outcomes were blood pressure and HbA(1c) and blood lipid levels. Multilevel analysis was used to adjust for dependency between repeated observations within one patient and for clustering of patients within general practices.

RESULTS

Patients in the intervention group received care far more in accordance with the guidelines than patients in the reference group. Odds ratios ranged from 2.43 (95% CI 1.01-5.82) for the measurement of urine albumin to 12.08 (4.70-31.01) for the measurement of blood pressure. No beneficial effect was found on any patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality improvement program improved the provision of diabetes care, but this was not accompanied by any effect on patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估一项质量改进计划对糖尿病患者所接受护理及患者结局的长期有效性。

研究设计与方法

对干预组的312例2型糖尿病患者和参照组的77例2型糖尿病患者进行了一项非随机试验。随访期为42个月。质量改进计划侧重于改善糖尿病护理的提供情况及患者结局。该计划包括临床实践指南、研究生教育、审核与反馈、糖尿病护理登记模板以及召回系统。从医疗记录中提取有关所提供护理的数据。护理提供方面的主要结局为患者年度就诊次数、血压、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及血脂水平。主要患者结局为血压、糖化血红蛋白及血脂水平。采用多水平分析来调整同一患者内重复观察值之间的相关性以及一般诊疗机构内患者的聚集性。

结果

干预组患者接受的护理远比参照组患者更符合指南要求。比值比范围从尿白蛋白测量的2.43(95%可信区间1.01 - 5.82)到血压测量的12.08(4.70 - 31.01)。未发现对任何患者结局有有益影响。

结论

质量改进计划改善了糖尿病护理的提供情况,但对患者结局未产生任何影响。

相似文献

1
Long-term effectiveness of a quality improvement program for patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice.一项针对全科医疗中2型糖尿病患者的质量改进项目的长期效果
Diabetes Care. 2001 Aug;24(8):1365-70. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.8.1365.
2
Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Netherlands and the United States: a comparison of two quality improvement programs.荷兰和美国2型糖尿病患者的护理质量:两项质量改进计划的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 1):709-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00254.x.
3
The impact of outpatient diabetes management on serum lipids in urban African-Americans with type 2 diabetes.门诊糖尿病管理对城市非裔美国2型糖尿病患者血脂的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Jan;25(1):9-15. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.1.9.
4
Quality of care for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus--a long-term comparison of two quality improvement programmes in the Netherlands.2型糖尿病患者的护理质量——荷兰两项质量改进计划的长期比较
Diabet Med. 2003 Oct;20(10):846-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01009.x.
5
Impact of a program to improve adherence to diabetes guidelines by primary care physicians.一项旨在提高初级保健医生对糖尿病指南依从性的项目的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2002 Nov;25(11):1946-51. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.11.1946.
6
Management of type 2 diabetes in Western Australian metropolitan general practice.西澳大利亚州大都市全科医疗中2型糖尿病的管理
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1994 Dec 31;26(3):197-208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(94)90061-2.
7
Relationship between ethnicity and glycemic control, lipid profiles, and blood pressure during the first 9 years of type 2 diabetes: U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 55).2型糖尿病最初9年中种族与血糖控制、血脂谱及血压之间的关系:英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS 55)
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jul;24(7):1167-74. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.7.1167.
8
Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics.2型糖尿病患者的医疗质量与治疗结果:全科医疗与糖尿病诊所的比较
Diabetes Care. 2004 Feb;27(2):398-406. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.2.398.
9
Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on glycemic control and complications in type II diabetes (VA CSDM). Results of the feasibility trial. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type II Diabetes.退伍军人事务部关于2型糖尿病血糖控制与并发症的合作研究(VA CSDM)。可行性试验结果。退伍军人事务部2型糖尿病合作研究。
Diabetes Care. 1995 Aug;18(8):1113-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.18.8.1113.
10
Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: a 2-year follow-up.
Diabetes Care. 2001 Jun;24(6):995-1000. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.6.995.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Results of a Spanish Delphi Consensus.与 2 型糖尿病患者临床实践指南依从性相关的因素:西班牙德尔菲共识的结果。
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Oct 23;2021:9970859. doi: 10.1155/2021/9970859. eCollection 2021.
2
Design of the PROstate cancer follow-up care in Secondary and Primary hEalth Care study (PROSPEC): a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care-based follow-up of localized prostate cancer survivors.PROstate cancer follow-up care in Secondary and Primary hEalth Care 研究(PROSPEC)设计:一项评价初级保健为基础的局限性前列腺癌幸存者随访有效性的随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07112-9.
3
Toward Standardized Monitoring of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care Using Electronic Medical Records: Systematic Review.利用电子病历对基层医疗中慢性病患者进行标准化监测:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 May 24;7(2):e10879. doi: 10.2196/10879.
4
International Models of Care that Address the Growing Diabetes Prevalence in Developing Countries.应对发展中国家糖尿病患病率不断上升的国际护理模式。
Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Aug;16(8):69. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0768-9.
5
Clinical practice guidelines in the AANS/CNS Section on Tumors: past, present and future directions.美国神经外科医师协会/中枢神经系统肿瘤学会肿瘤学分会临床实践指南:过去、现在及未来方向
J Neurooncol. 2014 Sep;119(3):557-68. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1497-z. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
The danish model for improvement of diabetes care in general practice: impact of automated collection and feedback of patient data.丹麦全科医疗中改善糖尿病护理的模式:患者数据自动收集与反馈的影响。
Int J Family Med. 2012;2012:208123. doi: 10.1155/2012/208123. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Care for patients with type 2 diabetes in a random sample of community family practices in ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省社区家庭医疗随机抽样样本中2型糖尿病患者的护理。
Int J Family Med. 2012;2012:734202. doi: 10.1155/2012/734202. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
The impact of adherence to screening guidelines and of diabetes clinics referral on morbidity and mortality in diabetes.筛查指南的遵循情况以及糖尿病诊所的转诊对糖尿病患者的发病率和死亡率的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e33839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033839. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
9
Associations between technical quality of diabetes care and patient experience.糖尿病护理技术质量与患者体验之间的关联。
Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):e136-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00729.x. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
10
Structured diabetes care leads to differences in organization of care in general practices: the healthcare professional and patient perspective.结构化的糖尿病护理导致一般实践中护理组织的差异:医疗保健专业人员和患者的观点。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 May 23;11:113. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-113.