• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知己和同龄群体对单身老年人幸福感的影响。

The effects of a confidant and a peer group on the well-being of single elders.

作者信息

Gupta V, Korte C

机构信息

Division of Multidisciplinary Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.

出版信息

Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;39(4):293-302. doi: 10.2190/4YYH-9XAU-WQF9-APVT.

DOI:10.2190/4YYH-9XAU-WQF9-APVT
PMID:7737741
Abstract

A study of 100 elderly people was carried out to compare the predictions of well-being derived from the confidant model with those derived from the Weiss model. The confidant model predicts that the most important feature of a person's social network for the well-being of that person is whether or not the person has a confidant. The Weiss model states that different persons are needed to fulfill the different needs of the person and in particular that a confidant is important to the need for intimacy and emotional security while a peer group of social friends is needed to fulfill sociability and identity needs. The two models were evaluated by comparing the relative influence of the confidant variable with the peer group variable on subject's well-being. Regression analysis was carried out on the well-being measure using as predictor variables the confidant variable, peer group variable, age, health, and financial status. The confidant and peer group variables were of equal importance to well-being, thus confirming the Weiss model.

摘要

一项针对100名老年人的研究开展了,目的是比较从知己模型得出的幸福感预测结果与从韦斯模型得出的幸福感预测结果。知己模型预测,就一个人的幸福感而言,其社交网络最重要的特征是这个人是否有一个知己。韦斯模型指出,需要不同的人来满足一个人的不同需求,特别是知己对于亲密感和情感安全感的需求很重要,而一群社会朋友则是满足社交性和身份认同需求所必需的。通过比较知己变量和同龄人群体变量对研究对象幸福感的相对影响,对这两个模型进行了评估。以知己变量、同龄人群体变量、年龄、健康状况和财务状况作为预测变量,对幸福感指标进行了回归分析。知己变量和同龄人群体变量对幸福感同等重要,从而证实了韦斯模型。

相似文献

1
The effects of a confidant and a peer group on the well-being of single elders.知己和同龄群体对单身老年人幸福感的影响。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1994;39(4):293-302. doi: 10.2190/4YYH-9XAU-WQF9-APVT.
2
Do older people benefit from having a confidant? An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study.老年人是否受益于有一个知己?一项俄克拉荷马州医生资源/研究网络(OKPRN)的研究。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Jan-Feb;26(1):9-15. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.01.120051.
3
Social interaction, loneliness, and emotional well-being among the elderly.老年人的社交互动、孤独感与情绪健康
Res Aging. 1987 Dec;9(4):459-82. doi: 10.1177/0164027587094001.
4
Confidant Availability (In)Stability and Emotional Well-Being in Older Men and Women.知己可用性(不稳定)与老年男女的情感幸福感。
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1041-1050. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw108.
5
Social determinants of loneliness among older Americans.美国老年人孤独感的社会决定因素。
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1996 Nov;122(4):453-73.
6
Confidant Network and Quality of Life of Individuals Aged 50+: The Positive Role of Internet Use.知己网络与 50 岁以上个体的生活质量:互联网使用的积极作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Nov;21(11):694-702. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0170. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
7
Well-being of 12-year-old children related to interpersonal relations, health habits and mental distress.12岁儿童的幸福感与人际关系、健康习惯及精神困扰的关系。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Sep;20(3):274-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2006.00405.x.
8
[Loneliness and social relations among mothers with infants].[有婴儿的母亲中的孤独感与社会关系]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2013;60(12):727-37.
9
Perception of happiness among elderly persons in metropolitan USA.美国大都市地区老年人的幸福感认知
Percept Mot Skills. 1998 Dec;87(3 Pt 1):787-93. doi: 10.2466/pms.1998.87.3.787.
10
Intimacy, loneliness, and openness to feelings in adult children of alcoholics.酗酒者成年子女的亲密感、孤独感及情感开放性。
Health Soc Work. 1995 Feb;20(1):52-9. doi: 10.1093/hsw/20.1.52.

引用本文的文献

1
The various effect of social isolation on depression risk among old population in China during covid-19 pandemic: A population based survey.新冠疫情期间中国老年人群体中社会隔离对抑郁风险的多种影响:一项基于人群的调查。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 6;20(6):e0325595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325595. eCollection 2025.
2
The Role of Social Support and Depressive Symptoms in Mediating the Association Between Hearing Loss and Self-neglect Among Older Adults in China.社会支持和抑郁症状在中国老年人听力损失与自我忽视之间的关联中所起的中介作用
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10361-2.
3
Social Support among Older Persons and Its Association with Smoking: Findings from the National Health and Morbidity Survey 2018.
老年人的社会支持及其与吸烟的关联:2018年全国健康与发病率调查结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 10;11(16):2249. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162249.
4
Understanding the associations between the number of close friends and life satisfaction: Considering age differences.理解亲密朋友数量与生活满意度之间的关联:考虑年龄差异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 28;14:1105771. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105771. eCollection 2023.
5
Social support and psychological well-being in younger and older adults: The mediating effects of basic psychological need satisfaction.年轻人和老年人的社会支持与心理健康:基本心理需求满足的中介作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1051968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1051968. eCollection 2022.
6
Social transformation and social isolation of older adults: Digital technologies, nursing, healthcare.老年人的社会转型与社会隔离:数字技术、护理与医疗保健
Collegian. 2021 Oct;28(5):551-558. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
7
The relationship between social support networks and depression in the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being.2007年全国心理健康与幸福调查中社会支持网络与抑郁症之间的关系。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;52(12):1463-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1440-7. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
8
Structural and functional measures of social relationships and quality of life among older adults: does chronic disease status matter?老年人社交关系与生活质量的结构和功能指标:慢性病状况有影响吗?
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jan;25(1):153-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1052-1. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
9
The complex nature of family support across the life span: Implications for psychological well-being.贯穿一生的家庭支持的复杂本质:对心理健康的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2015 Mar;51(3):277-88. doi: 10.1037/a0038665. Epub 2015 Jan 19.