• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国和以色列非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病筛查中的空腹血糖

Fasting plasma glucose in screening for NIDDM in the U.S. and Israel.

作者信息

Modan M, Harris M I

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1994 May;17(5):436-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.5.436.

DOI:10.2337/diacare.17.5.436
PMID:7741837
Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To demonstrate the inadequacy of fasting plasma glucose for screening for NIDDM, even among groups at high risk for diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS--Representative samples of adults 40-69 years of age in the U.S. (n = 2,035) and Israel (n = 2,316) were selected. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was measured and a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered. Subjects with undiagnosed NIDDM were identified using internationally accepted diagnostic criteria (FPG > or = 7.8 mM or 2-h plasma glucose > or = 11.1 mM). RESULTS--Only 31-38% of subjects with undiagnosed NIDDM had fasting hyperglycemia (> or = 7.8 mM), and 36% in the U.S. and 19% in Israel had normoglycemia (< 6.1 mM). Postchallenge glucose, diagnostic of diabetes, was associated with all fasting values, including values < 5.0 mM. Based on sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value, no FPG level provided a satisfactory cutoff point to use in screening for undiagnosed NIDDM. Sensitivity at each FPG cutoff point varied little among groups classified by age, sex, race, blood pressure status, or body mass index (BMI) levels > 23, but sensitivity was lower among those with BMI levels < 23. CONCLUSIONS--In the clinical setting, FPG is commonly used in screening for NIDDM. However, fasting values < or = 7.8 mM are highly insensitive for detecting NIDDM. Lower FPG cutoff points tha achieve acceptable sensitivity are accompanied by inadequately low specificity, require a high percentage of patients to be retested, and result in a low yield of diabetes among those screened. Clinicians and researchers who seek detection of undiagnosed NIDDM should use the OGTT, because FPG lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for this purpose.

摘要

目的——证明即使在糖尿病高危人群中,空腹血糖也不足以用于筛查非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病(NIDDM)。研究设计与方法——选取了美国40 - 69岁成年人的代表性样本(n = 2035)和以色列40 - 69岁成年人的代表性样本(n = 2316)。测量空腹血糖(FPG)并进行2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)。使用国际公认的诊断标准(FPG≥7.8 mM或2小时血浆葡萄糖≥11.1 mM)来识别未确诊的NIDDM患者。结果——未确诊的NIDDM患者中只有31% - 38%存在空腹血糖过高(≥7.8 mM),在美国有36%的患者以及在以色列有19%的患者血糖正常(<6.1 mM)。挑战后诊断糖尿病的血糖水平与所有空腹血糖值相关,包括<5.0 mM的值。基于敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值,没有一个FPG水平能提供一个令人满意的切点用于筛查未确诊的NIDDM。在按年龄、性别、种族、血压状况或体重指数(BMI)水平>23分类的组中,每个FPG切点的敏感性变化不大,但在BMI水平<23的人群中敏感性较低。结论——在临床环境中,FPG常用于筛查NIDDM。然而,空腹血糖值≤7.8 mM对检测NIDDM的敏感性极低。能达到可接受敏感性的较低FPG切点伴随着特异性过低,需要对很高比例的患者进行重新检测,并且在筛查人群中糖尿病检出率低。寻求检测未确诊NIDDM的临床医生和研究人员应使用OGTT,因为FPG在此目的上缺乏足够的敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
Fasting plasma glucose in screening for NIDDM in the U.S. and Israel.美国和以色列非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病筛查中的空腹血糖
Diabetes Care. 1994 May;17(5):436-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.17.5.436.
2
Evaluation of fasting plasma glucose as screening test for NIDDM in older adults. Rancho Bernardo Study.评估空腹血糖作为老年人非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病筛查试验。兰乔贝纳多研究。
Diabetes Care. 1991 Nov;14(11):989-93. doi: 10.2337/diacare.14.11.989.
3
A two-step strategy for identification of high-risk subjects for a clinical trial of prevention of NIDDM.一种用于非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病预防临床试验的高危受试者识别的两步策略。
Diabetes Care. 1996 Sep;19(9):972-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.19.9.972.
4
The fasting plasma glucose cut-point predicting a diabetic 2-h OGTT glucose level depends on the phenotype.预测糖尿病患者2小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验血糖水平的空腹血糖切点取决于其表型。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2002 Jan;55(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(01)00270-4.
5
Noninvasive type 2 diabetes screening: superior sensitivity to fasting plasma glucose and A1C.非侵入性2型糖尿病筛查:对空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白具有更高的敏感性。
Diabetes Care. 2007 May;30(5):1120-4. doi: 10.2337/dc06-2377. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
6
Alternative type 2 diabetes screening tests may reduce the number of U.S. adults with undiagnosed diabetes.替代型 2 型糖尿病筛查试验可能会减少美国未确诊糖尿病的成年人数量。
Diabet Med. 2020 Nov;37(11):1935-1943. doi: 10.1111/dme.14330. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
7
Analysis of fasting plasma glucose values for optimal detection of abnormal responses on the oral glucose tolerance test in at-risk study subjects.分析空腹血糖值以优化检测高危研究对象口服葡萄糖耐量试验中的异常反应。
Endocr Pract. 2007 Oct;13(6):583-9. doi: 10.4158/EP.13.6.583.
8
Fasting plasma glucose cutoff for diagnosis of diabetes in a Japanese population.日本人群中用于诊断糖尿病的空腹血糖临界值。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Sep;93(9):3425-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2819. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
9
HbA1c measurement improves the detection of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals with nondiagnostic levels of fasting plasma glucose: the Early Diabetes Intervention Program (EDIP).糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测可提高空腹血糖水平未达诊断标准的高危个体中2型糖尿病的检出率:早期糖尿病干预项目(EDIP)。
Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):465-71. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.465.
10
Evaluation of fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for diabetes mellitus in Singaporean adults.新加坡成年人空腹血糖作为糖尿病筛查试验的评估。
Diabet Med. 1997 Feb;14(2):119-22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199702)14:2<119::AID-DIA334>3.0.CO;2-G.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for current diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.糖尿病当前诊断标准的证据。
World J Diabetes. 2016 Sep 15;7(17):396-405. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.396.
2
Diagnosing diabetes with glucose criteria: worshiping a false God.用血糖标准诊断糖尿病:信奉虚假的神明。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Feb;34(2):524-6. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1689.
3
Antidiabetic effects of chitooligosaccharides on pancreatic islet cells in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.壳寡糖对链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病大鼠胰岛细胞的抗糖尿病作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb 7;13(5):725-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i5.725.
4
Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Navajo adolescents.纳瓦霍族青少年中的2型糖尿病
West J Med. 1999 Apr;170(4):210-3.