• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for severe femoral osteolysis.

作者信息

Raut V V, Siney P D, Wroblewski B M

机构信息

John Charnley Research Institute, Wrightington Hospital for Joint Disease, Wigan, UK.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):362-5.

PMID:7744915
Abstract

We reviewed prospectively cemented stem revision in 106 patients with severe femoral endosteal bone lysis without infection. Bone grafts were not used in any of the patients. The minimum follow-up was three years (mean 6 years 4 months). At the last review 76.4% of the patients were free of pain and 17.9% had only mild or occasional discomfort; radiographs showed well-fixed stable stems in 101 (95.3%). An intramedullary cement plug was used at revision to improve stability in 97.7%. There was new endosteal osteolysis after revision in 17 patients; only two had severe changes. Seven hips (6.6%) required a second revision; only four of these (3.8%) were for stem loosening. Survivorship of the revised stem, using radiological evidence of stem loosening as the end point, was 95.8% at seven years. The results of stem revision arthroplasty using cement in the presence of massive endosteal cavitation are satisfactory.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cemented Charnley revision arthroplasty for severe femoral osteolysis.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):362-5.
2
Revision for aseptic stem loosening using the cemented Charnley prosthesis. A review of 351 hips.使用骨水泥型Charnley假体对无菌性假体松动进行翻修。对351例髋关节的回顾性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Jan;77(1):23-7.
3
The Exeter Universal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre.埃克塞特通用柄:来自独立中心的至少十年回顾
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Dec;88(12):1584-90. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.18345.
4
[Femoral reconstruction with endosteal bone allografts protected by a metallic mesh in reoperation of total hip prosthesis. 19 cases with an average follow-up of 83 months].[金属网保护下的骨内膜同种异体骨移植用于全髋关节置换翻修术中的股骨重建。19例患者,平均随访83个月]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(4):360-7.
5
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.
6
Long-term results of proximal femoral replacement for non-neoplastic disorders.股骨近端置换治疗非肿瘤性疾病的长期疗效
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 May;77(3):351-6.
7
Mode of loosening of matt-finished femoral stems in primary total hip replacement.初次全髋关节置换中磨砂表面股骨柄假体的松动模式
Saudi Med J. 2002 Oct;23(10):1187-94.
8
The bone-vacuum cementing technique for the fixation of the stem in total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中用于固定柄的骨真空固定技术。
Chir Organi Mov. 2001 Apr-Jun;86(2):99-110.
9
Outcome after femoral revision using the restoration cone/conical femoral revision stem.使用恢复锥/锥形股骨翻修柄进行股骨翻修后的结果。
Orthopedics. 2011 Jan 3;34(1):11. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20101123-02.
10
[Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].[在翻修全髋关节置换术中是否应系统性翻修一体式骨水泥柄?一项前瞻性评估]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):670-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rco.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors influencing fracture characteristics in postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented stems in total hip arthroplasty : a multicentre observational cohort study on 584 fractures.全髋关节置换术中骨水泥型股骨柄周围术后假体周围股骨骨折的骨折特征影响因素:一项针对584例骨折的多中心观察性队列研究
Bone Jt Open. 2021 Jul;2(7):466-475. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0027.R1.
2
How long should patients be followed-up after total hip replacement? Current practice in the UK.全髋关节置换术后患者应随访多长时间?英国的当前做法。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Sep;81(5):348-51.