Hamajima N, Ohyashiki K, Toyama K
Division of Epidemiology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1995 Apr;25(2):51-4.
Events observed during a follow-up period are generally more informative when predicting the prognosis of patients than the clinical data available at the start of follow-up. The present paper has aimed to introduce a modified landmark method for estimating a survival curve for patients in whom an event related to their survival had occurred at a given landmark time during the follow-up period. Survival curves were compared graphically by the conventional method, the Mantel-Byar method, the landmark method and the modified landmark method. The subjects were ninety-five patients with myelodysplastic syndrome who had been diagnosed between 1979 and 1992 at Tokyo Medical College Hospital, and followed-up until September, 1993. Disease evolution was used as the event. The survival curves for patients with and without the event, calculated by the conventional method, were biased and not applicable to the actual patients at the start of follow-up before the occurrence of the event. The curves obtained using the Mantel-Byar method were not biased but similarly not applicable to the actual patients. The landmark method gave unbiased curves applicable to patients with and without the event at a given landmark time, but the curve for those with the event included a lead time from the onset of the event to the landmark time. The modified method gave an unbiased estimation of survival for patients in whom the event had just occurred around a given landmark time.
在预测患者预后时,随访期间观察到的事件通常比随访开始时可用的临床数据更具信息量。本文旨在介绍一种改良的标志性方法,用于估计在随访期间特定标志性时间发生了与生存相关事件的患者的生存曲线。通过传统方法、曼特尔 - 拜尔方法、标志性方法和改良标志性方法对生存曲线进行了图形比较。研究对象为1979年至1992年期间在东京医科大学医院诊断出的95例骨髓增生异常综合征患者,并随访至1993年9月。将疾病进展用作事件。用传统方法计算的有事件和无事件患者的生存曲线存在偏差,不适用于事件发生前随访开始时的实际患者。使用曼特尔 - 拜尔方法获得的曲线无偏差,但同样不适用于实际患者。标志性方法给出了适用于在给定标志性时间有事件和无事件患者的无偏差曲线,但有事件患者的曲线包括了从事件发生到标志性时间的提前期。改良方法对在给定标志性时间左右刚发生事件的患者的生存进行了无偏差估计。