Suppr超能文献

诺沃班(托烷司琼)单药及与地塞米松联合用于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:北欧经验。北欧止吐试验组

Navoban (tropisetron) alone and in combination with dexamethasone in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: the Nordic experience. The Nordic Antiemetic Trial Group.

作者信息

Sorbe B G, Högberg T, Glimelius B, Schmidt M, Wernstedt L, Andersson H, Hansen O, Sørensen B T, Räisänen I

机构信息

Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Orebro Medical Centre Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Anticancer Drugs. 1995 Feb;6 Suppl 1:31-6.

PMID:7749168
Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Navoban (tropisetron) three different Nordic multicentre trials were conducted during the period 1988-92. In all, 1050 patients were recruited from 15 centres. In the first study, Navoban monotherapy was compared with a high-dose metoclopramide cocktail. In the second, Navoban +/- dexamethasone was evaluated for those patients not fully protected by Navoban alone. In the third trial, Navoban was evaluated for various chemotherapy regimens, for long-term efficacy, and for various risk groups of patients. Spontaneous intercycle variations were also evaluated. Navoban was found to be as effective as the antiemetic cocktail but with a more favourable spectrum of side effects and a simpler schedule of administration. Navoban was more effective during the acute than the delayed phase. Addition of dexamethasone significantly improved prevention of both acute and delayed emesis. Long term efficacy seemed to be stable up to 10 cycles of chemotherapy. Patients treated with noncisplatin regimens showed significantly higher protection rates than patients treated with cisplatin. Various cancer diagnoses and cytostatic agents were also evaluated. Gender and age were important risk factors. Navoban was found to be an efficacious antiemetic agent, especially regarding acute nausea and vomiting. Addition of a corticosteroid significantly improved the effect during highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The role of Navoban for delayed emesis must be evaluated in future trials. The two most common side effects were headache and constipation. Overall, Navoban was well tolerated and patient compliance with the drug was high.

摘要

为评估呕必停(托烷司琼)的疗效和安全性,在1988年至1992年期间进行了三项不同的北欧多中心试验。总共从15个中心招募了1050名患者。在第一项研究中,将呕必停单一疗法与高剂量甲氧氯普胺混合剂进行了比较。在第二项研究中,对那些单独使用呕必停未得到充分保护的患者评估了呕必停+/-地塞米松。在第三项试验中,对呕必停在各种化疗方案、长期疗效以及不同风险组患者中的情况进行了评估。还评估了自发的周期间变化。结果发现呕必停与止吐混合剂效果相当,但副作用谱更有利且给药方案更简单。呕必停在急性期比延迟期更有效。添加地塞米松显著改善了对急性和延迟性呕吐的预防。长达10个周期的化疗中,长期疗效似乎稳定。接受非顺铂方案治疗的患者保护率显著高于接受顺铂治疗的患者。还评估了各种癌症诊断和细胞毒性药物。性别和年龄是重要的风险因素。发现呕必停是一种有效的止吐药,尤其是对于急性恶心和呕吐。在高度致吐性化疗期间添加皮质类固醇显著改善了效果。呕必停对延迟性呕吐的作用必须在未来试验中进行评估。两种最常见的副作用是头痛和便秘。总体而言,呕必停耐受性良好,患者对该药物的依从性高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验