Yeh P H, Jaw W C, Wang T C, Yen T Y
Department of Radiology, Taipei Municipal Yang-Ming Hospital, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1995 Feb;55(2):172-9.
Iliopsoas compartment lesion frequently goes undiagnosed at clinical presentation. Therefore, even delayed diagnosis may depend on radiographic techniques. Computed tomography (CT) can play an important role in the identification and localization of these lesions. This report concerns the experience of using CT to evaluate the iliopsoas compartment disorder.
Retrospective review of CT scans for 42 patients who had abnormalities of the iliopsoas compartment revealed that inflammation was responsible in 20, hemorrhage in 8, and tumor in 14 patients. Diagnoses were proven by surgery or biopsy/aspiration in all cases except in five cases whose CT findings correlated with their clinical pictures. A comparison was made among the surgical data, the CT and plain abdominal films. In addition, a comparative evaluation of CT features was also made.
By using a hypodense area for the diagnosis of psoas abscess, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT were 100%, 77%, and 88%, respectively. By using a diffuse involvement of the entire muscle for the diagnosis of hemorrhage, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT were 63%, 62%, and 62% respectively. By using a bone destruction for the diagnosis of tumors, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CT were 79%, 39%, and 69%, respectively. Evaluation of the iliopsoas compartment lesions was 91% sensitive by CT and 40% sensitive by plain X-ray film.
It is difficult to differentiate iliopsoas abscesses, hematomas and neoplasms without knowing the clinical history. However, when coupled with percutaneous aspiration biopsy, CT has proved to be an effective, rapid means to diagnose and guide the therapy of psoas lesions.
髂腰肌间隙病变在临床表现时常常未被诊断出来。因此,即使是延迟诊断也可能依赖于影像学技术。计算机断层扫描(CT)在这些病变的识别和定位中可以发挥重要作用。本报告涉及使用CT评估髂腰肌间隙疾病的经验。
对42例髂腰肌间隙异常患者的CT扫描进行回顾性分析,发现20例为炎症,8例为出血,14例为肿瘤。除5例CT表现与临床症状相符的病例外,所有病例均经手术或活检/抽吸证实诊断。对手术数据、CT和腹部平片进行了比较。此外,还对CT特征进行了对比评估。
以低密度区诊断腰大肌脓肿时,CT的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100%、77%和88%。以整个肌肉的弥漫性受累诊断出血时,CT的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为63%、62%和62%。以骨质破坏诊断肿瘤时,CT的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为79%、39%和69%。CT对髂腰肌间隙病变的评估敏感性为91%,腹部平片为40%。
在不了解临床病史的情况下,很难区分腰大肌脓肿、血肿和肿瘤。然而,当结合经皮抽吸活检时,CT已被证明是诊断和指导腰大肌病变治疗的一种有效、快速的手段。