Suppr超能文献

使用腹膜透析、持续动静脉血液滤过和持续动静脉血液透析滤过清除兔体内氯化铵和谷氨酰胺的研究。

Use of peritoneal dialysis, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration, and continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration for removal of ammonium chloride and glutamine in rabbits.

作者信息

Semama D S, Huet F, Gouyon J B, Lallemant C, Desgres J

机构信息

Service de Pédiatrie 2, CHUR du Bocage, Dijon, France.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):742-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(95)70402-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We compared the ability of peritoneal dialysis, hemofiltration, and continuous hemodiafiltration to remove infused ammonium chloride.

STUDY DESIGN

Anesthetized adult rabbits received an intravenous infusion of ammonium chloride. Two methods of removal of ammonium chloride were performed in each animal and compared. In group 1 (n = 6), peritoneal dialysis (dialysate = 75 ml.kg-1) and continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH) with a polysulfone 800 cm2 hemofilter (Minifilter Plus; Amicon Division, W. R. Grace & Co., Danvers, Mass.) were simultaneously performed for 40 minutes. In group 2 (n = 6), peritoneal dialysis and continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration (CAVHD) (dialysate flow = 1000 ml.hr-1) were simultaneous performed for 40 minutes. In group 3 (n = 6), CAVH and CAVHD were performed successively in random order for 30 minutes each.

RESULTS

Animals had high and stable ammonium chloride and glutamine plasma levels during the experimental procedure. No significant difference in ammonium chloride clearance was observed between PD and CAVH (group 1). In comparison with PD or CAVH, CAVHD resulted in significantly higher clearances of ammonium chloride (40% +/- 10% vs 96% +/- 34%, respectively) and of glutamine (195% +/- 17% vs 77% +/- 25%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The overall results indicate that CAVHD should be considered for hyperammonemia when peritoneal dialysis is indicated but unfeasible or inefficient.

摘要

目的

我们比较了腹膜透析、血液滤过和连续性血液透析滤过清除输注氯化铵的能力。

研究设计

对成年麻醉兔静脉输注氯化铵。在每只动物身上采用两种氯化铵清除方法并进行比较。第1组(n = 6),同时进行腹膜透析(透析液 = 75 ml·kg-1)和使用聚砜800 cm2血液滤过器(Minifilter Plus;美国马萨诸塞州丹弗斯市W. R. Grace公司旗下Amicon部门)的连续性动静脉血液滤过(CAVH),持续40分钟。第2组(n = 6),同时进行腹膜透析和连续性动静脉血液透析滤过(CAVHD)(透析液流量 = 1000 ml·小时-1),持续40分钟。第3组(n = 6),CAVH和CAVHD以随机顺序先后进行,各持续30分钟。

结果

在实验过程中,动物的氯化铵和谷氨酰胺血浆水平较高且稳定。腹膜透析和CAVH之间未观察到氯化铵清除率的显著差异(第1组)。与腹膜透析或CAVH相比,CAVHD导致氯化铵清除率(分别为40% ± 10%和96% ± 34%)和谷氨酰胺清除率(分别为195% ± 17%和77% ± 25%)显著更高。

结论

总体结果表明,当有腹膜透析指征但不可行或效率低下时,对于高氨血症应考虑采用CAVHD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验