• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[关于挥鞭伤的医生声明。补充信息的意义]

[Physician's statement concerning whiplash injuries. Significance of supplementary information].

作者信息

Michler R P, Bovim G, Schrader H

机构信息

Nevrologisk avdeling Regionsykehuset i Trondheim.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Mar 30;113(9):1104-6.

PMID:7755660
Abstract

The frequency of insurance cases following traffic accidents involving the whiplash mechanism is increasing in Norway. The economic consequences are obviously great, both for the individual patient and for society. Declarations by medical specialists may be of vital importance when assessing the degree of medical invalidity. We have investigated some of the information provided by 27 patients who were submitted for assessment of medical invalidity after traffic accidents. In eight of these cases, the information in reports from their usual doctor or physiotherapist varied from the case history described by the patient. In all these cases, a previous history of neck pain was found in the health reports, but was not mentioned, and was partly denied, by the patients. Our results underline the importance of supplementary information.

摘要

在挪威,涉及挥鞭样损伤机制的交通事故后保险理赔案件的发生率正在上升。这一情况对个体患者和社会都造成了明显的巨大经济后果。在评估医疗残疾程度时,医学专家的声明可能至关重要。我们调查了27名在交通事故后提交医疗残疾评估的患者所提供的一些信息。在其中8个案例中,他们的普通医生或物理治疗师报告中的信息与患者描述的病史有所不同。在所有这些案例中,健康报告中都发现了既往颈部疼痛史,但患者未提及且部分予以否认。我们的结果强调了补充信息的重要性。

相似文献

1
[Physician's statement concerning whiplash injuries. Significance of supplementary information].[关于挥鞭伤的医生声明。补充信息的意义]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Mar 30;113(9):1104-6.
2
[Yielding claim adjustment important factor behind the increase of whiplash injuries].[理赔让步是挥鞭伤增加背后的重要因素]
Lakartidningen. 2001 May 23;98(21):2643-6.
3
[Whiplash injuries].[挥鞭伤]
Duodecim. 1995;111(17):1700-3.
4
[Assessment of medical disability after whiplash injury. The first 112 cases assessed by the expert group appointed by the Norwegian Medical Association].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1997 Jan 10;117(1):17-21.
5
[Physicians' reports about the mechanisms of whiplash injuries].[医生关于挥鞭伤机制的报告]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1993 Sep 30;113(23):2940.
6
[A study of insurance claims in district court: Patients are disadvantaged against insurance companies].[地方法院保险理赔研究:患者相对于保险公司处于劣势]
Lakartidningen. 2002 Aug 22;99(34):3331-3.
7
Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims.消除痛苦和折磨赔偿对保险理赔结果的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 12;343(15):1119; author reply 1120.
8
[Street traffic accident--whiplash injury of the cervical spine from the viewpoint of insurance medicine].[道路交通事故——从保险医学角度看颈椎挥鞭伤]
Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1991;84(2):101-9.
9
Effect of eliminating compensation for pain and suffering on the outcome of insurance claims.消除痛苦和折磨赔偿对保险理赔结果的影响。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 12;343(15):1118-9; author reply 1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010123431511.
10
[Writing of expertises on whiplash injuries of the cervical spine (author's transl)].
Aktuelle Traumatol. 1982 Jan;12(1):4-11.

引用本文的文献

1
The late whiplash syndrome: a biopsychosocial approach.迟发性挥鞭样损伤综合征:一种生物心理社会方法。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;70(6):722-6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.6.722.