Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.
作者信息
Joshi G P
出版信息
Anesth Analg. 1995 Jun;80(6):1251-2. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199506000-00040.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.
Anesth Analg. 1995 Jun;80(6):1251-2. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199506000-00040.
2
Economic considerations of the use of new anesthetics: a comparison of propofol, sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane.新型麻醉剂使用的经济学考量：丙泊酚、七氟烷、地氟烷和异氟烷的比较
Anesth Analg. 1998 Mar;86(3):504-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199803000-00010.
3
Cost-effective anesthesia: desflurane versus propofol in outpatient surgery.经济有效的麻醉：门诊手术中地氟烷与丙泊酚的比较
AANA J. 1996 Feb;64(1):69-75.
4
Calculating the cost of desflurane and propofol: lower costs with lower infusion rates.
Anesth Analg. 1994 Aug;79(2):391-2. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199408000-00039.
5
Prospective, randomized cost analysis of anesthesia with remifentanil combined with propofol, desflurane or sevoflurane for otorhinolaryngeal surgery.瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚、地氟烷或七氟烷用于耳鼻喉科手术麻醉的前瞻性随机成本分析
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Nov;46(10):1251-60. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.461013.x.
6
A cost comparison of methohexital and propofol for ambulatory anesthesia.美索比妥与丙泊酚用于门诊麻醉的成本比较。
Anesth Analg. 1999 Aug;89(2):311-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199908000-00012.
7
Comparing apples to oranges.
Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):428-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00053.
8
Cost comparison: a desflurane- versus a propofol-based general anesthetic technique.成本比较：地氟烷与丙泊酚全身麻醉技术的比较
Anesth Analg. 1994 Nov;79(5):852-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199411000-00006.
9
Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane.与使用地氟烷的标准方案相比，使用靶控输注的丙泊酚麻醉的成本效益。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jul 15;59(14):1344-50. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.14.1344.
10
The cost of desflurane and propofol anesthesia.地氟烷和丙泊酚麻醉的费用。
Anesth Analg. 1993 May;76(5):1172. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199305000-00064.
Zotero 插件