• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国关于器官和组织采购的公共政策。国家器官和组织采购研究的结果。

Public policy governing organ and tissue procurement in the United States. Results from the National Organ and Tissue Procurement Study.

作者信息

Siminoff L A, Arnold R M, Caplan A L, Virnig B A, Seltzer D L

机构信息

University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 1;123(1):10-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00037.

DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00037
PMID:7762908
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine why Required Request policies, which mandate that hospitals request donation from donor-eligible families, have not resulted in increased organ procurement.

SETTING

Stratified sample of 23 acute-care general hospitals in two metropolitan areas.

DESIGN

Chart review identified all eligible donors in study hospitals during a 20-month period. Health care professionals who spoke with the families of eligible donors after death were interviewed to determine families' and health care providers' behaviors after patients' deaths with reference to the donation process.

PARTICIPANTS

All patient deaths (n = 10,681) were reviewed, and 841 donor-eligible cases were chosen for in-depth study; 1809 health care professionals who provided care to these patients were interviewed.

MEASUREMENTS

The ability of health care providers to identify donor-eligible patients, approach families about donation, and obtain families' consent to donation.

RESULTS

83% of health care professionals correctly identified donor-eligible patients. The families of donor-eligible patients were approached about donation in 73.0% of the cases. Families were more likely to be approached about organ (86.6%) donation than either tissue (69.5%) or cornea (67.3%) donation (P < 0.001). The families of organ-eligible patients were less likely to be approached if the patient was female, was on a general medical or surgical floor, or was being cared for by internists. Only 46.5% of families of eligible donors agreed to donate organs, 34.5% agreed to donate tissues, and 23.5% agreed to donate corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Although health care professionals do request that families donate, families consent to donation less frequently than was previously assumed. Empirically based education campaigns are needed so that health care professionals can improve their communication skills and so that discussion about this important issue can be stimulated among family members.

摘要

目的

确定要求医院向符合捐赠条件的家庭请求捐赠的“必需请求”政策为何未使器官获取量增加。

背景

来自两个大都市地区23家急性护理综合医院的分层样本。

设计

通过病历审查确定研究医院在20个月期间的所有符合条件的捐赠者。对在患者死亡后与符合条件的捐赠者家属交谈过的医护人员进行访谈,以确定患者死亡后家属和医护人员在捐赠过程中的行为。

参与者

审查了所有患者死亡病例(n = 10681),选择了841例符合捐赠条件的病例进行深入研究;对为这些患者提供护理的1809名医护人员进行了访谈。

测量指标

医护人员识别符合捐赠条件患者的能力、就捐赠事宜与家属沟通的能力以及获得家属捐赠同意的能力。

结果

83%的医护人员正确识别了符合捐赠条件的患者。在73.0%的病例中,就捐赠事宜与符合捐赠条件患者的家属进行了沟通。与组织(69.5%)或角膜(67.3%)捐赠相比,家属更有可能被提及器官(86.6%)捐赠(P < 0.001)。如果患者为女性、在普通内科或外科病房或由内科医生护理,符合器官捐赠条件患者的家属被提及捐赠的可能性较小。只有46.5%的符合条件捐赠者家属同意捐赠器官,34.5%同意捐赠组织,23.5%同意捐赠角膜。

结论

尽管医护人员确实会请求家属捐赠,但家属同意捐赠的频率低于先前的设想。需要开展基于实证的教育活动,以便医护人员能够提高沟通技巧,并促进家庭成员之间就这一重要问题进行讨论。

相似文献

1
Public policy governing organ and tissue procurement in the United States. Results from the National Organ and Tissue Procurement Study.美国关于器官和组织采购的公共政策。国家器官和组织采购研究的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Jul 1;123(1):10-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-1-199507010-00037.
2
The process of organ donation and its effect on consent.器官捐赠的过程及其对同意的影响。
Clin Transplant. 2001 Feb;15(1):39-47. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150107.x.
3
Differences in the procurement of organs and tissues by health care professionals.医疗保健专业人员在器官和组织获取方面的差异。
Clin Transplant. 1994 Oct;8(5):460-5.
4
Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation.影响家庭同意捐赠实体器官用于移植的因素。
JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):71-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.71.
5
Comparison of black and white families' experiences and perceptions regarding organ donation requests.黑人和白人家庭在器官捐赠请求方面的经历与看法比较。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):146-51. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00023.
6
Health care professional attitudes toward donation: effect on practice and procurement.医疗保健专业人员对捐赠的态度:对实践和获取的影响。
J Trauma. 1995 Sep;39(3):553-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199509000-00025.
7
Differences in willingness to donate cadaveric organ between young donor families and adult donor families: evidence from the Hunan Province, China.年轻供体家庭和成年供体家庭在捐献尸体器官意愿方面的差异:来自中国湖南省的证据。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(15):2830-3.
8
Pediatric organ donation: a national survey examining consent rates and characteristics of donor hospitals.儿科器官捐赠:一项关于捐赠医院同意率和特征的全国性调查。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;10(4):500-4. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318198b06b.
9
Determinants of family consent to tissue donation.家庭对组织捐赠同意的决定因素。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):956-63. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d8924b.
10
Families' understanding of brain death.家庭对脑死亡的理解。
Prog Transplant. 2003 Sep;13(3):218-24. doi: 10.1177/152692480301300309.

引用本文的文献

1
Complexity of Decision-Making!: Case Studies of Cadaveric Organ Donations in Ahmedabad, India.决策的复杂性!:印度艾哈迈达巴德尸体器官捐赠的案例研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 21;15:2147-2154. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S376879. eCollection 2022.
2
Regional Differences in Communication Process and Outcomes of Requests for Solid Organ Donation.实体器官捐赠请求的沟通流程及结果的地区差异
Am J Transplant. 2017 Jun;17(6):1620-1627. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14165. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
3
A Comparison of Request Process and Outcomes in Donation After Cardiac Death and Donation After Brain Death: Results From a National Study.
心脏死亡后捐赠与脑死亡后捐赠的申请流程及结果比较:一项全国性研究的结果
Am J Transplant. 2017 May;17(5):1278-1285. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14084. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Communicating Effectively about Organ Donation: A Randomized Trial of a Behavioral Communication Intervention to Improve Discussions about Donation.关于器官捐赠的有效沟通:一项行为沟通干预改善捐赠讨论的随机试验。
Transplant Direct. 2015 Mar;1(2). doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000513.
5
Assessment of resident and fellow knowledge of the organ donor referral process.住院医师和研究员对器官捐献者转诊流程的知识评估。
Clin Transplant. 2014 Apr;28(4):443-449. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12338. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
6
Altruism in terminal cancer patients and rapid tissue donation program: does the theory apply?晚期癌症患者的利他行为与快速组织捐赠计划:该理论适用吗?
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):857-64. doi: 10.1007/s11019-013-9480-6.
7
Consent to organ donation: a review.器官捐赠同意书:综述
Prog Transplant. 2013 Mar;23(1):99-104. doi: 10.7182/pit2013801.
8
Interim results of a national test of the rapid assessment of hospital procurement barriers in donation (RAPiD).国家医院采购障碍快速评估(RAPiD)测试的中期结果。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Nov;12(11):3094-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04220.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
9
An exploratory study of relational, persuasive, and nonverbal communication in requests for tissue donation.在组织、说服和非言语交际的探索性研究中提出对组织捐赠的要求。
J Health Commun. 2011 Oct;16(9):955-75. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.561908. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
Determinants of family consent to tissue donation.家庭对组织捐赠同意的决定因素。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):956-63. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d8924b.