Millikan K W, Silverstein J, Hart V, Blair K, Bines S, Roberts J, Doolas A
Department of General Surgery, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill., USA.
Arch Surg. 1995 Jun;130(6):617-24. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060055011.
To evaluate the effect of surgical approach and adjuvant therapy on patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and/or cardia.
Retrospective analysis of 157 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy.
A private university medical center and its affiliated community hospital.
One hundred twenty men and 37 women (mean age, 61.7 years) with carcinoma of the esophagus and/or cardia that was surgically treated between 1978 and 1993.
Three approaches were used for resection: Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) (n = 67), transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) (n = 71), and abdominal-only esophagectomy (AOE) (n = 19). Sixty-five patients received adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Surgical mortality, morbidity, and survival and the effect of adjuvant therapy.
The overall surgical mortality rate was 7.6%: 12.7% with the TTE, 4.5% with the THE, and 0% with the AOE approach. A significantly increased incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome (P < .001) and empyema (P < .001) was seen with the TTE approach. The average intraoperative blood loss (P = .08) and the median intensive care unit stay (P = .26) and hospital stay (P = .40) were decreased with the THE and AOE approaches when compared with the TTE approach without significance. The overall median survival time was 17 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 21%. There was no significant difference in survival by pathologic stage between approaches. The addition of adjuvant therapy did not affect the overall median survival time or the 5-year survival rate. Node-positive patients did benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy, with increased median survival times from 7 to 15 months and a 5-year survival rate from 0% to 15% (P = .01).
The THE and AOE approaches have fewer early complications than does TTE. Both THE and TTE have equal long-term survival rates. Adjuvant therapy provides increased survival to node-positive patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and/or cardia.
评估手术方式及辅助治疗对食管癌和/或贲门癌患者的影响。
对157例连续接受食管切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。
一所私立大学医学中心及其附属社区医院。
120例男性和37例女性(平均年龄61.7岁),患有食管癌和/或贲门癌,于1978年至1993年间接受手术治疗。
采用三种手术方式进行切除:经裂孔食管切除术(THE)(n = 67)、经胸食管切除术(TTE)(n = 71)和单纯腹部食管切除术(AOE)(n = 19)。65例患者接受了辅助放疗和化疗。
手术死亡率、发病率、生存率以及辅助治疗的效果。
总体手术死亡率为7.6%:TTE为12.7%,THE为4.5%,AOE为0%。TTE手术方式导致成人呼吸窘迫综合征(P <.001)和脓胸(P <.001)的发生率显著增加。与TTE手术方式相比,THE和AOE手术方式的平均术中失血量(P =.08)、重症监护病房平均住院时间(P =.26)和住院时间(P =.40)有所减少,但差异无统计学意义。总体中位生存时间为17个月,5年生存率为21%。不同手术方式的病理分期生存率无显著差异。辅助治疗的加入并未影响总体中位生存时间或5年生存率。淋巴结阳性患者确实从辅助放疗和化疗中获益,中位生存时间从7个月增加到15个月,5年生存率从0%提高到15%(P =.01)。
THE和AOE手术方式的早期并发症少于TTE。THE和TTE的长期生存率相当。辅助治疗可提高食管癌和/或贲门癌淋巴结阳性患者的生存率。