DeVita V T, Wasserman T H, Young R C, Carter S K
Cancer. 1976 Jul;38(1 SUPPL):509-25. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197607)38:1<509::aid-cncr2820380175>3.0.co;2-a.
Gynecologic cancers present unusual opportunities to explore the fruits of well-designed clinical trials to assess the value of existing treatment using a combined modality approach soon after diagnosis. Cancers of the ovary and uterus have well-defined, familiar natural histories. Pathways of spread are clear and reasons for treatment failure are often blatantly obvious. In the case of ovarian cancer, regional treatment with surgery and radiotherapy has been relatively ineffective and generally has not improved the survival statistics in the last two decades. Spread of tumor cells widely throughout the abdominal cavity outside radiation or surgical fields, even in patients with apparently early disease, is the obvious reason. Studies are underway to assess the impact of long-term postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with L-phenylalanine mustard, an alkylating agent effective in patients with advanced disease, in early stages of ovarian cancer following surgery and or x-irradiation. The search is on for more effective drugs, or combinations of drugs, that could subsequently serve as more effective adjuvant treatments. In carcinoma of the uterine cervix, chemotherapy as an adjunct to surgery and/or radiotherapy in patients with localized, or locally inoperable disease has been poorly evaluated; little data are available and the value of many established drugs in patients with metastatic cervical cancer is undermined. Some recent evidence suggests the use of hydroxyurea, a drug that by itself is not effective in controlling tumor, may enhance the effect of radiotherapy in patients with Stage II disease. Uterine fundal cancer is often successfully treated by surgery alone. The data for the use of pre- or postoperative radiotherapy are open to considerable question. While the relative nontoxic progesterone compounds are effective in a small but significant fraction of patients with advanced uterine cancer, no properly designed clinical trial has truly evaluated their role as postoperative adjuncts in patients who have resectable tumor but a definite high risk of recurrence. Systemic chemotherapy has been rarely used with any consistency against this tumor but, even so, some chemotherapeutic leads, such as the use of adriamycin, are worthy of exploration. The absence of useful information on systemic treatment of gynecologic malignancies can be traced to the excessive rigid compartmentalization of medical practice. Only recently have investigators of all persuasions begun to explore and exploit some of the therapeutic opportunities, which have been available for some time.
妇科癌症为探索精心设计的临床试验成果提供了独特契机,以便在确诊后不久就采用综合治疗方法评估现有治疗手段的价值。卵巢癌和子宫癌有着明确且为人熟知的自然病程。其扩散途径清晰,治疗失败的原因往往显而易见。就卵巢癌而言,过去二十年来,手术和放疗的局部治疗效果相对不佳,总体上并未改善生存统计数据。肿瘤细胞在放疗或手术区域之外广泛扩散至整个腹腔,即便在看似早期疾病的患者中也是如此,这就是明显原因。目前正在开展研究,评估在卵巢癌术后及/或接受x线照射后的早期阶段,使用对晚期疾病患者有效的烷化剂左旋苯丙氨酸氮芥进行长期术后辅助化疗的影响。人们正在寻找更有效的药物或药物组合,以便随后用作更有效的辅助治疗。在子宫颈癌中,对于局部或局部无法手术的患者,化疗作为手术和/或放疗的辅助手段,评估甚少;可用数据很少,许多已确立的药物在转移性宫颈癌患者中的价值也受到质疑。最近一些证据表明,使用羟基脲(一种本身对控制肿瘤无效的药物)可能会增强II期疾病患者放疗的效果。子宫底癌通常仅通过手术就能成功治疗。术前或术后放疗的使用数据存在诸多疑问。虽然相对无毒的孕酮化合物对一小部分但相当数量的晚期子宫癌患者有效,但尚无经过妥善设计的临床试验真正评估它们在有可切除肿瘤但复发风险明确较高的患者中作为术后辅助手段的作用。针对这种肿瘤,全身化疗很少得到一致应用,但即便如此,一些化疗线索,如使用阿霉素,仍值得探索。关于妇科恶性肿瘤全身治疗缺乏有用信息,可归因于医疗实践中过度严格的分科。直到最近,各种派别的研究人员才开始探索和利用一些已经存在一段时间的治疗机会。