Bellhouse B J, Sobey I J, Alani S, DeBlois B M
Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK.
Bioseparation. 1994 Apr;4(2):127-38.
The performance of membrane filters is limited by concentration polarisation and membrane fouling. High shear rates reduce these effects but can damage delicate cells and proteins in biological fluids. Secondary flows to promote fluid mixing, and hence enhance filtration, can be highly effective, but usually carry the penalty of complexity. Oscillatory flow over furrowed or dimpled membrane surfaces (vortex mixing) has been shown to be very efficient in the microfiltration and oxygenation of blood, but carries the added complexity of oscillatory flow and the need to thermoform the membranes. To allow the use of asymmetric or rigid membranes, a new form of vortex mixing has been studied, in which the membranes are flat and form parallel channels. Feed flow is oscillatory and passes back-and-forth across ladder-like flow deflectors to generate standing vortex waves. Flow visualisation studies and numerical calculations of standing vortex waves (SVW) were undertaken to help optimise flow parameters and flow deflector geometry. Flat plate membrane ultrafilters were built and evaluated for different geometries of flow deflector, using solutions of bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the test fluid. Very high filtration rates were measured with BSA concentrations ranging from 1 to 24%. A SVW ultrafilter was compared with a Millipore Pellicon ultrafilter using BSA as the test fluid. Filtration flux was similar at low concentrations of BSA, but was greater by a factor of 4.5 in the SVW device at high concentrations of BSA.
膜过滤器的性能受到浓差极化和膜污染的限制。高剪切速率可降低这些影响,但可能会损坏生物流体中的脆弱细胞和蛋白质。促进流体混合从而增强过滤效果的二次流可能非常有效,但通常会带来结构复杂的问题。已证明在有沟纹或凹坑的膜表面上的振荡流(涡旋混合)在血液的微滤和氧合方面非常有效,但存在振荡流的额外复杂性以及对膜进行热成型的需求。为了能够使用不对称或刚性膜,研究了一种新的涡旋混合形式,其中膜是平的并形成平行通道。进料流是振荡的,并且来回穿过梯状导流板以产生驻涡波。进行了驻涡波(SVW)的流动可视化研究和数值计算,以帮助优化流动参数和导流板几何形状。构建了平板膜超滤器,并使用牛血清白蛋白(BSA)溶液作为测试流体,对不同几何形状的导流板进行了评估。在BSA浓度范围为1%至24%的情况下,测量到了非常高的过滤速率。使用BSA作为测试流体,将SVW超滤器与密理博百利康超滤器进行了比较。在低浓度BSA时,过滤通量相似,但在高浓度BSA时,SVW装置中的过滤通量要高4.5倍。