Devroey P, Tjandraprawira K, Mannaerts B, Coelingh Bennink H, Smitz J, Bonduelle M, De Brabanter A, Van Steirteghem A C
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussels), Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 1995 Feb;10(2):332-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135938.
A randomized, assessor-blind, group-comparative study was performed to compare the efficacy of Normegon [75 IU follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and 25 IU luteinizing hormone (LH) and Metrodin (75 IU FSH and < 1.25 IU LH) in infertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer. None of the patients were pituitary-suppressed by means of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist treatment. They were randomized in blocks of five with a ratio between treatment with Normegon and with Metrodin of 3:2. A total of 158 patients started hormonal treatment, i.e. 93 patients with Normegon and 65 patients with Metrodin and a total of 248 cycles were performed. Evaluation of first treatment cycles included statistical analysis of the total number of ampoules, number of follicles (> or = 14 mm), serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of HCG (10,000 IU) administration, the number of oocytes retrieved and the ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt and per transfer. For none of these parameters were significant differences revealed. In both groups the median duration of stimulation was 7 days and the median number of ampoules used was 21. Overall, the duration of treatment was short in order to prevent as much as possible endogenous LH rises. The overall ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer of all cycles was 21% in the Normegon group and 19% in the Metrodin group. Analysis of completed treatment cycles (n = 90) with premature rises of LH > 10.0 IU/l and/or progesterone > 1.0 ng/l revealed a relatively high incidence (23%) of fertilization failure and poor embryo quality, but the ongoing pregnancy rate per transfer was still 22%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
进行了一项随机、评估者盲法、组间比较研究,以比较诺美康(75 国际单位促卵泡生成素(FSH)和 25 国际单位促黄体生成素(LH))与美诺孕(75 国际单位 FSH 和<1.25 国际单位 LH)对接受体外受精(IVF)和胚胎移植的不孕女性的疗效。所有患者均未接受促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂治疗来抑制垂体功能。她们按 5 人一组进行随机分组,接受诺美康治疗与接受美诺孕治疗的比例为 3:2。共有 158 例患者开始激素治疗,即 93 例接受诺美康治疗,65 例接受美诺孕治疗,共进行了 248 个周期。对首个治疗周期的评估包括对安瓿总数、卵泡数(≥14 毫米)、注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(10,000 国际单位)当天的血清雌二醇浓度、取出的卵母细胞数以及每次尝试和每次移植的持续妊娠率进行统计分析。这些参数均未显示出显著差异。两组的刺激中位持续时间均为 7 天,使用的安瓿中位数量均为 21 支。总体而言,治疗持续时间较短,以尽可能防止内源性 LH 升高。诺美康组所有周期每次移植的总体持续妊娠率为 21%,美诺孕组为 19%。对 LH>10.0 国际单位/升和/或孕酮>1.0 纳克/升过早升高的完整治疗周期(n = 90)分析显示,受精失败和胚胎质量差的发生率相对较高(23%),但每次移植的持续妊娠率仍为 22%。(摘要截选至 250 字)