Shibasaki H, Ikeda A
Department of Brain Pathophysiology, Kyoto University School of Medicine.
Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1994 Dec;34(12):1234-6.
Medically intractable epilepsy, defined as the clinical attacks occurring at least once a month in spite of appropriate antiepileptic drug treatments, is one of the commonest disorders in the clinical neurology. Since surgical treatment of epilepsy is successful in selected patients, it is most important to delineate the epileptogenic focus and functions of adjacent cortical areas as precisely as possible. Recent advances in electrophysiology, magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) have enabled us to elucidate the epileptogenic focus noninvasively without involving the conventional invasive EEG recording techniques. We evaluated 37 patients with intractable partial seizures by using prolonged video/EEG monitoring with sphenoidal or T1/T2 electrodes. MRI, ictal and interictal SPECT for blood flow measurement and interictal FDG-PET for glucose metabolism. Among 20 patients with intractable epilepsy who had a single ictal focus, PET, ictal SPECT and MRI findings were correlated with the ictal EEG finding with the concordance rate of 100, 86 and 75%, respectively. If all of those findings were convergent upon a single focus, then the surgical treatment with intraoperative corticography is most likely effective without employing any invasive recording. If those findings were divergent, then the invasive evaluation will be indicated.
药物难治性癫痫被定义为尽管进行了适当的抗癫痫药物治疗但临床发作每月至少发生一次,是临床神经病学中最常见的疾病之一。由于癫痫的手术治疗在部分患者中取得成功,因此尽可能精确地描绘致痫灶和相邻皮质区域的功能至关重要。电生理学、脑磁图、磁共振成像(MRI)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)等功能成像技术的最新进展使我们能够在不涉及传统侵入性脑电图记录技术的情况下无创地阐明致痫灶。我们通过使用带有蝶骨电极或T1/T2电极的长时间视频/脑电图监测对37例难治性部分性癫痫患者进行了评估。进行了MRI、发作期和发作间期SPECT用于血流测量以及发作间期FDG-PET用于葡萄糖代谢评估。在20例有单个发作期病灶的难治性癫痫患者中,PET、发作期SPECT和MRI结果与发作期脑电图结果相关,符合率分别为100%、86%和75%。如果所有这些结果都集中在单个病灶上,那么术中皮质电图的手术治疗很可能有效,而无需采用任何侵入性记录。如果这些结果不一致,则需要进行侵入性评估。