Messner-Pellenc P, Ximenes C, Brasileiro C F, Mercier J, Grolleau R, Préfaut C G
Service de Cardiologie, Hopital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.
Chest. 1994 Aug;106(2):354-60. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.2.354.
The aim of this study was to bring to light new and simple criteria, obtained during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, in order to demonstrate in patients the cardiac or the pulmonary origin of a comparable exertional dyspnea. Forty male subjects were compared, who exercised with a 30-W/3-min protocol and were divided into three groups: the cardiac heart failure (CHF) group (n = 15), the chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD) group (n = 15), and the control group (n = 10). The two groups of patients differed totally from the control group concerning their spirometric values at rest and a clear inability during effort which was confirmed by all the studied cardiopulmonary parameters at maximal exercise. The CHF and COLD groups differed slightly concerning their maximum symptom-limited oxygen uptake, only when related to body mass (13.26 +/- 0.69 ml/kg/min in CHF group, 17.05 +/- 1.59 ml/kg/min in COLD group; p < 0.05), and concerning their maximum ventilatory equivalent for oxygen which tended to be higher in the CHF group in comparison with the COLD group (p = 0.082). Furthermore, and as foreseen, the two groups of patients clearly differed at maximum exercise concerning the ventilatory reserve respiratory parameter (49.73 +/- 3.18 percent in CHF group, 8.38 +/- 5.85 percent in COLD group; p < 0.01). On the other hand, they did not differ concerning cardiac parameters or those considered as such (maximum heart rate [HR], HR reserve, HR response, maximum O2 pulse measurement). While their maximum ventilation was similar in the CHF and COLD groups, a difference in adaptation during exercise was found by observing their breathing pattern. In the CHF group, this was demonstrated by a significantly lower breathing frequency at maximum exercise (31.24 +/- 1.53 beats/min vs 37.75 +/- 2.24 beats/min; p < 0.05) and a tidal volume that tended to be higher at maximum exercise (p = 0.077) and significantly higher at 60-W work load (p < 0.05). This work shows that the study of ventilatory reserve and breathing pattern during exercise testing allows one to discriminate if dyspnea on exertion in patients is due to cardiac or respiratory disease.
本研究的目的是揭示在心肺运动试验中获得的新的简单标准,以便在患者中证明类似运动性呼吸困难的心脏或肺部起源。比较了40名男性受试者,他们按照30瓦/3分钟方案进行运动,并分为三组:心力衰竭(CHF)组(n = 15)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COLD)组(n = 15)和对照组(n = 10)。两组患者在静息肺量计值方面与对照组完全不同,并且在运动时明显无法达到最大运动时所有研究的心肺参数所证实的能力。CHF组和COLD组在最大症状限制摄氧量方面略有不同,仅与体重相关时(CHF组为13.26±0.69毫升/千克/分钟,COLD组为17.05±1.59毫升/千克/分钟;p<0.05),并且在最大氧通气当量方面,CHF组与COLD组相比有更高的趋势(p = 0.082)。此外,正如所预见的,两组患者在最大运动时的通气储备呼吸参数方面明显不同(CHF组为49.73±3.18%,COLD组为8.38±5.85%;p<0.01)。另一方面,他们在心脏参数或被视为心脏参数的方面没有差异(最大心率[HR]、HR储备、HR反应、最大氧脉搏测量)。虽然CHF组和COLD组的最大通气量相似,但通过观察他们的呼吸模式发现运动期间的适应存在差异。在CHF组中,这表现为最大运动时呼吸频率显著降低(31.24±1.53次/分钟对37.75±2.24次/分钟;p<0.05),并且潮气量在最大运动时有更高的趋势(p = 0.077),在60瓦工作负荷时显著更高(p<0.05)。这项工作表明,在运动试验期间研究通气储备和呼吸模式可以辨别患者运动性呼吸困难是由心脏疾病还是呼吸系统疾病引起的。