Baader A P, Kristan W B
Department of Biology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0357, USA.
J Comp Physiol A. 1995 Jun;176(6):715-26. doi: 10.1007/BF00192620.
Changes in the behavior of crawling leeches were investigated after various kinds of manipulations, including selective transection or inactivation of body parts, as well as partial or complete transection of the central nerve cord, using a frame-by-frame analysis of video tapes of the crawling animals. From these studies, we found that: 1. Leeches made rhythmic crawling cycles even after their suckers were prevented from contacting the substrate by covering them over with glue. Hence, engagement and disengagement of the suckers are not necessary links in the crawling cycle. 2. Cutting the small, medial connective (Faivre's nerve) had no influence on crawling, but contraction during the whole-body shortening reflex was interrupted. Thus two behaviors which use the same motor output (i.e., whole-body shortening and the contraction phase of crawling) are mediated by two different pathways. 3. Cutting all the connectives between two ganglia in the middle of the leech resulted in a loss of coordination between the parts of the animal on either side of the cut. Therefore, temporally coordinated sucker activity must be mediated through these connectives. 4. Pieces of leech bodies produced by complete transection produced rhythmic crawling cycles as long as the pieces included the head or tail plus 2-4 adjacent midbody segments. In all cases, the crawling movements progressed without delays as the movements reached the cut ends. Pieces of animals that included only midbody segments did not produce crawling movements. 5. These results can be explained by a model composed of intersegmental pathways for both elongation and contraction, circuits in the head and tail brains that switch between elongation and contraction, and both ascending and descending inhibitory influences that determine when the cycle switches from elongation to contraction and back again.
通过对爬行水蛭的录像带进行逐帧分析,研究了在进行各种操作后,包括对身体部位进行选择性横切或使其失活,以及对中枢神经索进行部分或完全横切后,爬行水蛭行为的变化。从这些研究中,我们发现:1. 即使水蛭的吸盘被胶水覆盖而无法接触底物,它们仍能进行有节奏的爬行周期。因此,吸盘的附着和脱离并非爬行周期中的必要环节。2. 切断小的内侧结缔组织(法夫尔神经)对爬行没有影响,但全身缩短反射期间的收缩被中断。因此,两种使用相同运动输出的行为(即全身缩短和爬行的收缩阶段)由两条不同的途径介导。3. 切断水蛭中部两个神经节之间的所有结缔组织会导致切口两侧动物部分之间失去协调。因此,暂时协调的吸盘活动必须通过这些结缔组织介导。4. 完全横切产生的水蛭身体片段只要包含头部或尾部加上2 - 4个相邻的中间身体节段,就能产生有节奏的爬行周期。在所有情况下,当运动到达切口末端时,爬行运动没有延迟地继续进行。仅包含中间身体节段的动物片段不会产生爬行运动。5. 这些结果可以用一个模型来解释,该模型由伸长和收缩的节间途径、头部和尾部脑区中在伸长和收缩之间切换的回路,以及决定周期何时从伸长切换到收缩再切换回来的上行和下行抑制影响组成。