Greenspan J D, McGillis S L
Department of Neurosurgery and Physiology, SUNY Health Science Center at Syracuse 13210, USA.
Somatosens Mot Res. 1994;11(4):311-7. doi: 10.3109/08990229409028875.
Twenty-four healthy human subjects provided thresholds for their perception of pressure, sharpness, and pain. Mechanical forces were applied to the dorsal surface of the digits with flat-tipped probes of various sizes. Thresholds (expressed as force) increased with increasing probe size, as previously described. There was no evidence of a laterality difference for any of the thresholds. There was a trend for increasing thresholds with repeated testing, but this trend was not statistically significant for the group as a whole. Examination of individual subjects' thresholds over time revealed that 27% showed significant increases in pain threshold over the 15 days of testing. In contrast, only 6% of subjects showed significant increases in sharpness or pressure thresholds over the same period. Thus, whereas most subjects exhibited stable pain thresholds, approximately one-fourth showed significant increases in pain threshold over time. We conclude that for evaluating regional dysesthesia or hemidysesthesia, a right-left difference in pain thresholds will provide a more sensitive and reliable measure than absolute pain threshold.
24名健康受试者提供了他们对压力、锐痛和疼痛的感知阈值。使用各种尺寸的平头探针向手指背侧施加机械力。如前所述,阈值(以力表示)随着探针尺寸的增加而升高。没有证据表明任何阈值存在左右差异。随着重复测试,阈值有升高的趋势,但对于整个组而言,这种趋势没有统计学意义。对个体受试者随时间的阈值进行检查发现,27%的受试者在15天的测试中疼痛阈值显著升高。相比之下,在同一时期,只有6%的受试者锐痛或压力阈值显著升高。因此,虽然大多数受试者的疼痛阈值稳定,但约四分之一的受试者疼痛阈值随时间显著升高。我们得出结论,对于评估局部感觉异常或偏侧感觉异常,疼痛阈值的左右差异将比绝对疼痛阈值提供更敏感和可靠的测量方法。