• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Report cards or instrument panels: who needs what?

作者信息

Nelson E C, Batalden P B, Plume S K, Mihevc N T, Swartz W G

机构信息

Hitchcock Clinic, Lebanon, NH 03756-0001, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Apr;21(4):155-66. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30136-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30136-5
PMID:7780530
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The report card movement in health care is a positive response to legitimate customer needs and requirements for comparative information on quality and costs. At the same time, providers have a legitimate concern about potential problems with gathering and using valid data in a prudent manner. Report cards have problems that often detract from their potentially constructive uses. In response to this concern, the authors propose that instrument panels--a newer concept in health care--compared to the static, judgmental image of report cards project an action-oriented, decision-making image.

EXAMPLES

Descriptions are given of three types of instrument panels based on work in progress in the Dartmouth-Hitchcock health care system, a regional, integrated delivery system that serves the population of New Hampshire and parts of Vermont and Massachusetts: a 450-physician group practice (The Hitchcock Clinic), which provides more than one million visits per year in more than 25 locations; a tertiary health care facility (Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital) with more than 300,000 patient days; and prepaid health plan (Matthew Thornton Health Plan) with approximately 120,000 members.

SUMMARY

It would be wise and efficient for providers to design instrument panel data collection systems that can feed directly into report cards, leading to the triple benefit of enhancing accuracy, reducing total costs, and increasing overall utility to both providers and their customers.

摘要

相似文献

1
Report cards or instrument panels: who needs what?
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1995 Apr;21(4):155-66. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30136-5.
2
Report cards accelerate quality and accountability.
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1996 Jun;5(3):57-62.
3
Health care report cards: what about consumers' perspectives?医疗保健报告卡:消费者怎么看?
J Ambul Care Manage. 1994 Oct;17(4):1-14. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199410000-00003.
4
Making the grade: a status report on hospital report cards.评级情况:医院成绩单现状报告
Health Syst Rev. 1997 Sep-Oct;30(5):11-4.
5
Health plan report cards: exploring differences in plan ratings.健康计划成绩单:探究计划评级的差异。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Jan;24(1):5-20. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30355-8.
6
Physician report cards more prevalent among MCOs, but do they work?
Manag Care Strateg. 1998 Dec;6(12):137-9.
7
Why patients have little patience for report cards.为何患者对成绩单缺乏耐心。
Manag Care. 1998 Mar;7(3):31-2, 34.
8
Can consumers understand managed care report cards?消费者能理解管理式医疗的成绩单吗?
Manag Care Interface. 1998 Nov;11(11):91-5.
9
Making the grade: update on report card initiatives for 1997.取得进展:1997年成绩单计划最新情况
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1997 Apr;6(2):55-62.
10
Performance reporting of health care delivery systems: will it make the grade?医疗保健服务系统的绩效报告:它能达标吗?
J Ambul Care Manage. 1994 Oct;17(4):15-28. doi: 10.1097/00004479-199410000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Health promotion: causes, beliefs and measurements.健康促进:原因、观念与衡量方法。
Clin Med Res. 2003 Jul;1(3):249-58. doi: 10.3121/cmr.1.3.249.
2
Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data.影响直线经理对医院绩效数据认知的因素。
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):261-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00115.
3
Performance of number-between g-type statistical control charts for monitoring adverse events.用于监测不良事件的数字区间g型统计控制图的性能
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec;4(4):319-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1011806727354.
4
Number-between g-type statistical quality control charts for monitoring adverse events.用于监测不良事件的介于数字之间的g型统计质量控制图。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec;4(4):305-18. doi: 10.1023/a:1011846412909.
5
Implementing outcome systems: lessons from a test of the BASIS-32 and the SF-36.实施结果系统:来自BASIS-32和SF-36测试的经验教训。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999 Feb;26(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/BF02287791.
6
Improving the quality of care for children in health systems.提高卫生系统中儿童的护理质量。
Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct;33(4 Pt 2):1091-109.