Yan J, Wang Y, Yang S
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou.
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1995 Jan;31(1):28-35.
The clinical characteristics of 45 cases of refractive accommodative esotropia were compared with 31 cases of the control group who remained orthotropic in the presence of uncorrected same degree of hypermetropia. In addition to the general ophthalmologic and orthoptic examinations, the accommodative convergence/accommodation (AC/A) ratio, fusional vergences and random dot stereopsis were investigated. The hypermetropic patients without esotropia were found to have a lower AC/A ratio and normal fusional function, while in cases with refractive accommodative esotropia, their AC/A ratios were normal and their fusional functions were decreased, especially significant being the divergent fusional function. In both groups, their stereopsis was defective or absent. It is suggested that esotropia be not simply caused by excessive accommodation due to uncorrected hypermetropia, and the range of divergent fusional function and the level of AC/A ratio be the two factors which determine the causation of esotropia in cases with uncorrected hypermetropia.
将45例屈光性调节性内斜视患者的临床特征与31例在存在相同程度未矫正远视时仍保持正视的对照组患者进行比较。除了常规眼科和视光学检查外,还研究了调节性集合/调节(AC/A)比率、融合性聚散和随机点立体视。发现无内斜视的远视患者AC/A比率较低且融合功能正常,而在屈光性调节性内斜视病例中,其AC/A比率正常但融合功能下降,尤其是分开融合功能显著下降。两组患者的立体视均有缺陷或缺失。提示内斜视并非单纯由未矫正远视导致的过度调节引起,分开融合功能范围和AC/A比率水平是决定未矫正远视病例中内斜视病因的两个因素。