Klimke A, Klieser E
Psychiatrische Klinik der Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Rheinische Landes- und Hochschulklinik Düsseldorf.
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1995 May;63(5):173-93. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996615.
The dibenzoepine derivative clozapine is seen as a prototype of an atypical neuroleptic, because clozapine has good antipsychotic efficacy but only minimal dopamine antagonistic properties in common animal paradigms. The latter is reflected by the observation that extrapyramidal symptoms during clozapine are a rare phenomenon. Furthermore, recent studies in the USA demonstrated a superior efficacy of clozapine in schizophrenic patients who are nonresponsive to classic neuroleptics. Therefore, the introduction of clozapine in the USA was performed in 1990 despite the well-known risk of agranulocytosis (1-2% during the first year of treatment); however, under restricted conditions regarding the mandatory weekly control of the white blood cell count. For the use of clozapine in Europe, it should be underlined that in 1992 the indication was restricted to "acute and chronic forms of schizophrenia" whereas formerly it was permitted to treat several other neuroleptic resistant syndromes with clozapine, e.g. severe psychotic excitement, aggressive behavior or manic or atypical psychosis. The usage of clozapine in these indications is now only permitted under the restricted legal conditions of a "therapeutic trial" in selected patients. However, several indications for which clozapine has been used successfully in Europe are currently re-investigated in the USA, hopefully leading to a redefinition and extension of the indication spectrum. On the other hand, the American multicenter trials lead to the conclusion that the treatment with clozapine is not furthermore the treatment of last choice but a serious therapeutic alternative which should be available for all schizophrenic patient in case of neuroleptic resistance or of severe side effects of standard neuroleptics. Clozapine treatment leads to an improvement of the quality of life in one third of these schizophrenics and, moreover, results in a marked reduction of costs mainly by reducing the rehospitalisation rates. On the other hand, the list of well-known side effects of clozapine (e.g. agranulocytosis, increased risk of seizures, initial sedation) has to be extended (e.g. transient leucocytosis or eosinophilia, rare but severe complications like cardiorespiratory arrest and "sudden death" during combination with benzodiazepines, case reports of pericarditis, pancreatitis or polyserositis). On the background of possible cardiorespiratory complications we recommend to start the first treatment with clozapine in high risk patients (e.g. those in older age or in case of organic brain impairment) only in restricted indications and only in centers with sufficient clozapine experience.
二苯并氮䓬衍生物氯氮平被视为非典型抗精神病药物的原型,因为在常见动物模型中,氯氮平具有良好的抗精神病疗效,但多巴胺拮抗特性却很微弱。这一点体现在氯氮平治疗期间锥体外系症状罕见这一观察结果上。此外,美国最近的研究表明,氯氮平对那些对经典抗精神病药物无反应的精神分裂症患者疗效更佳。因此,尽管已知有粒细胞缺乏症的风险(治疗第一年发生率为1 - 2%),氯氮平仍于1990年在美国上市;不过,使用条件受限,必须每周强制检查白细胞计数。关于氯氮平在欧洲的使用,需要强调的是,1992年其适应证仅限于“精神分裂症的急性和慢性形式”,而此前它被允许用于治疗其他几种对抗精神病药物耐药的综合征,如严重的精神兴奋、攻击行为或躁狂或非典型精神病。现在,只有在选定患者中进行“治疗试验”的严格法律条件下,才允许将氯氮平用于这些适应证。然而,氯氮平在欧洲已成功用于的一些适应证目前正在美国重新研究,有望导致适应证范围的重新定义和扩大。另一方面,美国的多中心试验得出结论,氯氮平治疗并非最后的选择,而是一种重要的治疗替代方法,对于所有出现抗精神病药物耐药或标准抗精神病药物严重副作用的精神分裂症患者都应提供。氯氮平治疗能使三分之一的此类精神分裂症患者生活质量得到改善,而且,主要通过降低再住院率,还能显著降低成本。另一方面,氯氮平已知的副作用清单(如粒细胞缺乏症、癫痫发作风险增加、初期镇静)必须加以扩充(如短暂性白细胞增多或嗜酸性粒细胞增多、与苯二氮䓬类药物合用时罕见但严重的并发症如心肺骤停和“猝死”、心包炎、胰腺炎或多浆膜炎的病例报告)。鉴于可能出现的心肺并发症,我们建议,对于高危患者(如老年患者或有器质性脑损伤的患者),仅在严格的适应证下且仅在有足够氯氮平使用经验的中心开始使用氯氮平进行首次治疗。