• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管反应性:钙通道阻滞的一种测量方法。

Vascular reactivity: a measurement of calcium channel blockade.

作者信息

Elliott H L

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Mar;9 Suppl 1:S29-32.

PMID:7783111
Abstract

Clinical studies have shown that calcium antagonist drugs interfere with the reactivity of vascular smooth muscle and thereby attenuate the pressor responses to adrenergic and non-adrenergic vasoconstrictor agents. It is, therefore, possible to explore the extent and duration of calcium channel blockade by studying the magnitude and time course of the attenuation of pressor responses. The effects of three long-acting calcium antagonists, amlodipine, lacidipine and nifedipine GITS (gastrointestinal therapeutic system), on vascular reactivity were assessed over 24h and 48h dosage intervals. It was shown that all three agents attenuate the vasoconstrictor responses to both adrenergic and non-adrenergic stimuli. However, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS were found to suppress vascular reactivity more consistently than lacidipine over 24h. Extending the analysis to 48h after dosing showed that amlodipine had the most consistent effect.

摘要

临床研究表明,钙拮抗剂药物会干扰血管平滑肌的反应性,从而减弱对肾上腺素能和非肾上腺素能血管收缩剂的升压反应。因此,通过研究升压反应减弱的程度和时间过程,有可能探索钙通道阻滞的程度和持续时间。在24小时和48小时的给药间隔内,评估了三种长效钙拮抗剂氨氯地平、拉西地平和硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)对血管反应性的影响。结果表明,所有三种药物均能减弱对肾上腺素能和非肾上腺素能刺激的血管收缩反应。然而,发现在24小时内,氨氯地平和硝苯地平GITS比拉西地平更能持续抑制血管反应性。将分析扩展至给药后48小时表明,氨氯地平的作用最为持续。

相似文献

1
Vascular reactivity: a measurement of calcium channel blockade.血管反应性:钙通道阻滞的一种测量方法。
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Mar;9 Suppl 1:S29-32.
2
Calcium antagonism: aldosterone and vascular responses to catecholamines and angiotensin II in man.钙拮抗作用:人体中醛固酮以及血管对儿茶酚胺和血管紧张素II的反应
J Hypertens Suppl. 1993 Dec;11(6):S13-6.
3
Calcium antagonists block angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in humans: comparison with their effect on phenylephrine-induced vasoconstriction.钙拮抗剂可阻断人类体内血管紧张素 II 介导的血管收缩:与它们对去氧肾上腺素诱导的血管收缩的作用比较。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992 Jun;261(3):879-84.
4
Coronary vascular reactivity and calcium antagonist therapy in patients with angina.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24 Suppl A:S30-6.
5
Long-acting calcium antagonists: amlodipine versus nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS).长效钙拮抗剂:氨氯地平与硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)对比
J Hypertens Suppl. 1993 Dec;11(5):S332-3.
6
Pharmacological in vitro studies of the new 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium antagonist lercanidipine.新型1,4 - 二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂乐卡地平的体外药理学研究
Arzneimittelforschung. 1996 Jan;46(1):15-24.
7
Effects of long-acting calcium channel antagonists on neurohumoral factors: comparison of nifedipine coat-core with amlodipine.长效钙通道拮抗剂对神经体液因子的影响:硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2003 Jan;41 Suppl 1:S77-81.
8
Lacidipine: effects on vascular pressor responses throughout the dosage interval in normotensive subjects.拉西地平:对正常血压受试者整个给药间隔期血管升压反应的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Aug;46(2):127-32. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00760.x.
9
Comparative effects of felodipine ER, amlodipine and nifedipine GITS on 24 h blood pressure control and trough to peak ratios in mild to moderate ambulatory hypertension: a forced titration study.非洛地平缓释片、氨氯地平和硝苯地平控释片对轻至中度动态高血压患者24小时血压控制及谷峰比值的比较效应:一项强制滴定研究。
Can J Cardiol. 1998 May;14(5):682-8.
10
Ca2+ channel blocking activity of lacidipine and amlodipine in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells.拉西地平与氨氯地平对A7r5血管平滑肌细胞的钙离子通道阻滞活性
Eur J Pharmacol. 1993 Jan 15;244(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/0922-4106(93)90019-6.