Suppr超能文献

他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与哌拉西林治疗细菌性肺炎的对比研究

[A comparative study of tazobactam/piperacillin and piperacillin in bacterial pneumonia].

作者信息

Oizumi K, Ohno T, Kawahara M, Kawaguchi S, Saisho M, Mitutake Y, Saito A, Tomizawa M, Koike T, Takebe K

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1995 Apr;48(4):449-81.

PMID:7783313
Abstract

The efficacy, safety and usefulness of tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC), in bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess were determined with PIPC as the control in a multi-institutional comparative study a penicillin antibiotic for injection prepared by combining a newly developed beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam (TAZ), with a broad spectrum penicillin antibiotic, piperacillin (PIPC), at a ratio of 1:4. TAZ/PIPC was intravenously injected at a dose of 2.5 g (titer) twice a day, and PIPC at a dose of 2.0 g (titer) twice a day as a rule for 14 days. The following results were obtained: 1. The efficacy rates for bacterial pneumonia and lung abscess were 94% (80/85) in TAZ/PIPC group and 89% (70/79) in PIPC group, showing no significant difference between the two groups. 2. In a comparison of degrees of improvement in clinical symptoms, signs and laboratory findings, there were no significant differences between the two groups except for results on thoracic rales after three days of administration. 3. As for bacteriological effects, the elimination rates of causative organisms were 98% (40/41) in the TAZ/PIPC group and 80% (28/35) in the PIPC group. Thus, the TAZ/PIPC group was significantly superior to the PIPC group. The TAZ/PIPC group showed significantly better eradication of bacteria as well. Bacteria considered to be pyogenic were detected in 80 patients (43 administered TAZ/PIPC and 37 administered PIPC), but beta-lactamase production was confirmed in only 11 patients of each group. There were no significant differences in bacteriological effects among these patients. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of TAZ/PIPC against beta-lactamase producing organisms were distinctly superior to those of PIPC. 4. Side effects occurred in 10% (10/96) of the TAZ/PIPC group and 7% (7/95) of the PIPC group. Abnormal clinical laboratory test values were observed in 22% (20/92) of the TAZ/PIPC group and 18% (17/93) of the PIPC group. Thus, there were no significant differences between the two administration groups. 5. The usefulness rate in the TAZ/PIPC group was 87% (75/86) and it was 85% (67/79) in the PIPC group, showing no significant difference between them. The results suggest that TAZ/PIPC administered at a dose of 2.5 g (titer) twice a day is more useful than PIPC administered at a dose of 2.0 g (titer) twice a day in the treatment of bacterial pneumonia.

摘要

在一项多机构比较研究中,以哌拉西林(PIPC)作为对照,测定了他唑巴坦/哌拉西林(TAZ/PIPC)在细菌性肺炎和肺脓肿治疗中的疗效、安全性及实用性。TAZ/PIPC是一种注射用青霉素类抗生素,由新开发的β-内酰胺酶抑制剂他唑巴坦(TAZ)与广谱青霉素抗生素哌拉西林(PIPC)按1:4的比例组合而成。TAZ/PIPC静脉注射剂量为2.5g(效价),每日两次,PIPC剂量为2.0g(效价),通常每日两次,疗程为14天。结果如下:1. TAZ/PIPC组细菌性肺炎和肺脓肿的有效率为94%(80/85),PIPC组为89%(70/79),两组之间无显著差异。2. 在临床症状、体征和实验室检查结果的改善程度比较中,除给药三天后的胸部啰音结果外,两组之间无显著差异。3. 就细菌学效果而言,TAZ/PIPC组病原菌清除率为98%(40/41),PIPC组为80%(28/35)。因此,TAZ/PIPC组明显优于PIPC组。TAZ/PIPC组在细菌根除方面也表现出明显更好的效果。在80例患者(43例接受TAZ/PIPC治疗,37例接受PIPC治疗)中检测到化脓性细菌,但每组仅11例患者证实产生β-内酰胺酶。这些患者在细菌学效果方面无显著差异。TAZ/PIPC对产β-内酰胺酶菌株的最低抑菌浓度明显优于PIPC。4. TAZ/PIPC组副作用发生率为10%(10/96),PIPC组为7%(7/95)。TAZ/PIPC组22%(20/92)的患者观察到临床实验室检查值异常,PIPC组为18%(17/93)。因此,两个给药组之间无显著差异。5. TAZ/PIPC组的有效利用率为87%(75/86),PIPC组为85%(67/79),两者之间无显著差异。结果表明,每日两次给予2.5g(效价)的TAZ/PIPC在治疗细菌性肺炎方面比每日两次给予2.0g(效价)的PIPC更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验