Suppr超能文献

他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与哌拉西林治疗慢性呼吸道感染的对比研究

[A comparative study of tazobactam/piperacillin and piperacillin in chronic respiratory tract infections].

作者信息

Oizumi K, Kawahara M, Kawaguchi S, Sigematsu H, Tanaka F, Sano N, Saito A, Hiraga Y, Ohmichi M, Inoue H

机构信息

First Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Jpn J Antibiot. 1995 Apr;48(4):482-513.

PMID:7783314
Abstract

The efficacy, safety and usefulness were evaluated for a combined antibiotic tazobactam/piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) consisting of a new beta-lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam (TAZ), and a broad spectrum penicillin antibiotic, piperacillin (PIPC), in chronic respiratory tract infections with PIPC as the control in a multi-institutional comparative study. The drugs used were a preparation containing 0.5 g of TAZ and 2.0 g of PIPC per vial (TAZ/PIPC group) and a preparation containing 2.0 g of (PIPC group). The drugs were intravenously injected one vial at a time twice a day for 14 days as a rule. The following results were obtained: 1. Clinical effect There was no significant difference between TAZ/PIPC (86% or 76/88) and PIPC (81% or 69/85). 2. Bacteriological effect There was no significant difference between TAZ/PIPC (93% or 42/45) and PIPC (88% or 36/41) in terms of bacterial eradication rates. In 34 patients with beta-lactamase-producing pyogenic bacteria, there was no significant difference between TAZ/PIPC (77% or 10/13) and PIPC (88% or 15/17). 3. Degrees of improvement in clinical symptoms, signs and laboratory findings The TAZ/PIPC group was likely to show reductions in fever and the amount of sputum soon after administration. 4. Side effects Incidences of side effects were 7% (7/96) in the TAZ/PIPC group and 3% (3/89) in the PIPC group, showing no significant difference between the two groups. The main symptoms were allergic reaction and gastrointestinal symptoms. 5. Abnormal clinical laboratory test values The incidence was 17% (15/89) in the TAZ/PIPC group and 21% (18/87) in the PIPC group. The main symptoms were eosinophilia and hepatic dysfunction, and most of these symptoms were mild. 6. Usefulness The usefulness rates in the TAZ/PIPC group were 80% (71/89) and 78% (66/85) in the PIPC group, showing no significant difference. Thus, TAZ/PIPC exhibited excellent clinical effects and presented no troubles with safety. When comprehensively evaluated, TAZ/PIPC appears to be a very useful drug for the treatment of chronic respiratory tract infections.

摘要

在一项多机构比较研究中,以哌拉西林(PIPC)作为对照,对由新型β-内酰胺酶抑制剂他唑巴坦(TAZ)和广谱青霉素抗生素哌拉西林(PIPC)组成的联合抗生素他唑巴坦/哌拉西林(TAZ/PIPC)在慢性呼吸道感染中的疗效、安全性和实用性进行了评估。使用的药物为每瓶含0.5g他唑巴坦和2.0g哌拉西林的制剂(TAZ/PIPC组)以及含2.0g哌拉西林的制剂(PIPC组)。通常情况下,药物每天静脉注射1瓶,每日2次,共14天。获得了以下结果:1. 临床疗效TAZ/PIPC组(86%或76/88)与PIPC组(81%或69/85)之间无显著差异。2. 细菌学疗效TAZ/PIPC组(93%或42/45)与PIPC组(88%或36/41)在细菌清除率方面无显著差异。在34例产β-内酰胺酶化脓性细菌患者中,TAZ/PIPC组(77%或10/13)与PIPC组(88%或15/17)之间无显著差异。3. 临床症状、体征及实验室检查结果的改善程度TAZ/PIPC组在给药后不久体温和痰液量可能会降低。4. 副作用TAZ/PIPC组副作用发生率为7%(7/96),PIPC组为3%(3/89),两组之间无显著差异。主要症状为过敏反应和胃肠道症状。5. 临床实验室检查异常值TAZ/PIPC组发生率为17%(15/89),PIPC组为21%(18/87)。主要症状为嗜酸性粒细胞增多和肝功能障碍,且这些症状大多较轻。6. 实用性TAZ/PIPC组的实用率为�0%(71/89),PIPC组为78%(66/85),无显著差异。因此,TAZ/PIPC表现出优异的临床疗效且安全性方面无问题。综合评估时,TAZ/PIPC似乎是治疗慢性呼吸道感染的一种非常有用的药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验