• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[斯堪的纳维亚患者保险的积极经验]

[Positive experiences in Scandinavian patient insurance].

作者信息

Oldinger E

出版信息

Nord Med. 1995;110(6-7):176-9.

PMID:7784160
Abstract

Voluntary insurance for the compensation of patients for damage sustained in health care was introduced in Sweden 20 years ago and similar systems exist in Finland, Denmark and Norway. This type of insurance is, or is in the process of becoming, statutory. The basic principle is that the apportioning of blame to any individual(s) is not a prerequisite for compensation to be paid out for injury sustained by a patient. Owing to hospital proprietors and care givers having taken out patient insurance policies with approved insurance companies, it has been possible for damages to be compensated in accordance with current insurance norms and the frequency of lawsuits arising from injury sustained in health care has been minimised. This type of insurance is universally accepted, and has often enabled unfortunate confrontations between doctors and patients to be avoided.

摘要

20年前瑞典引入了患者医疗损害赔偿自愿保险,芬兰、丹麦和挪威也存在类似制度。这类保险已成为或正在成为法定保险。基本原则是,在支付患者所受伤害的赔偿金时,并不以确定责任归咎于任何个人为先决条件。由于医院所有者和护理人员已向经批准的保险公司购买了患者保险单,因此有可能按照现行保险规范对损害进行赔偿,并将医疗保健中受伤引发的诉讼频率降至最低。这类保险已被普遍接受,并且常常能够避免医生与患者之间不幸的冲突。

相似文献

1
[Positive experiences in Scandinavian patient insurance].[斯堪的纳维亚患者保险的积极经验]
Nord Med. 1995;110(6-7):176-9.
2
Statutory caps: an involuntary contribution to the medical malpractice insurance crisis or a reasonable mechanism for obtaining affordable health care?法定上限:是对医疗事故保险危机的非自愿贡献,还是获得可负担医疗保健的合理机制?
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1993 Spring;9:337-75.
3
Rethinking responsibility for patient injury: accelerated-compensation events, a malpractice and quality reform ripe for a test.重新思考患者伤害的责任:加速赔偿事件,一项有待检验的医疗事故与质量改革措施。
Law Contemp Probl. 1991 Winter-Spring;54(1-2):Spring 147-77.
4
Sweden's no-fault patient-injury insurance.
N Engl J Med. 1976 Jun 3;294(23):1268-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197606032942305.
5
Constitutional rights versus malpractice insurance settlements.宪法权利与医疗事故保险理赔
Physician Exec. 1994 Aug;20(8):7-9.
6
[Patients' complaints--many channels and poor oversight].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 May 30;110(14):1854-7.
7
No-fault insurance in New Zealand and in Sweden.
Med Malpract Cost Containment J. 1979 Apr;1(1):52-62.
8
Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden.对来自瑞典非侵权、无责备的全国性患者保险系统的23364份患者发起、医生审核的医疗事故索赔进行分析:经验教训
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Feb;85(1000):69-73. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022897.
9
[Patient insurance in preventive activities. Wealth of injury material demonstrates risks of complications].[预防性活动中的患者保险。丰富的损伤资料显示了并发症的风险]
Nord Med. 1995;110(6-7):180-3.
10
[Medical liability. Comparative compensation for personal injury in Europe].[医疗责任。欧洲人身伤害的比较赔偿]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2005 May;189(5):815-28; discussion 828-9.