Bongard S
Institut für Physiologische Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Psychophysiology. 1995 May;32(3):242-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb02960.x.
This study was designed to examine the invested mental effort during active and passive coping by means of performance data. Dual-task performance was measured while subjects coped with a situation, either actively or passively. Thirty-six male students worked on a primary mental arithmetic task (MAT) and a secondary choice reaction time task simultaneously. Half of the sample could avoid an aversive tone by performing well on the MAT. For the remaining half, their performance had no influence on the tone. The aversive tone stimulation of these subjects was yoked to a "partner," in the first group. Subjects with control showed elevated cardiovascular responses and inferior secondary task performance than subjects without control. No differences were found in the performance on the MAT. These results were in line with the assumption that subjects with control spent more effort on the primary task. Subjects under the active coping condition probably payed more attention to the tone, which consumed more cognitive resources.
本研究旨在通过表现数据来检验主动应对和被动应对过程中投入的心理努力。在受试者主动或被动应对某种情况时,测量其双重任务表现。三十六名男学生同时进行一项主要的心算任务(MAT)和一项次要的选择反应时任务。样本中的一半可以通过在MAT上表现良好来避免厌恶音调。对于其余一半,他们的表现对音调没有影响。在第一组中,这些受试者的厌恶音调刺激与一名“伙伴”相匹配。有控制条件的受试者比无控制条件的受试者表现出更高的心血管反应和更差的次要任务表现。在心算任务的表现上未发现差异。这些结果符合这样的假设,即有控制条件的受试者在主要任务上投入了更多努力。处于主动应对条件下的受试者可能更关注音调,这消耗了更多认知资源。