Emory T S, Scheithauer B W, Hirose T, Wood M, Onofrio B M, Jenkins R B
Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1995 Jun;103(6):696-704. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/103.6.696.
The nature of perineurioma, variably termed "localized hypertrophic neuropathy," "intraneural neurofibroma," and "hypertrophic interstitial neuritis" has long been an issue of contention. Most authors consider it a neoplasm, but some a reactive process. Eight clinically and morphologically typical perineuriomas were studied by histologic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural methods. One perineurioma was subject to tissue culture and cytogenetic study and another to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The patients, 3 males and 5 females, ranged in age from 11 to 38 years. All tumors were intraneural, and involved extremities (2 sciatic, 1 median, 1 femoral, 1 peroneal, 1 brachial plexus, 1 ulnar, and 1 radial). Neurologic symptoms, motor in all cases and sensory in 4, were present from 1 month to 7 years (mean 1.2 years). Fusiform, segmental nerve enlargement was clinically apparent in only two patients, but was evident on MRI in five of eight patients. Lesion length ranged from 3.5 to 30 cm, the largest involving the sciatic nerve from the obturator foramen to the knee. One lesion involved two nerve roots, but no association with a phakomatosis was noted. Treatment consisted of biopsy in six cases and resection in two cases. Histologically, pseudo-onion bulbs composed of epithelial membrane antigen-reactive, S-100 protein-negative perineurial cells surrounded myelinated or nonmyelinated nerve fibers. Many were accompanied by their S-100 protein-positive Schwann sheaths. Some whorls lacked a central axon. A single mitosis was noted in one case. The MIB-1 antigen labelling index ranged from 4% to 17%. Staining for p53 antigen in six cases showed no (2 of 6), rare (2 of 6), or scattered (2 of 6) immunoreactive nuclei. Cytogenetic analysis in one case demonstrated a chromosomally abnormal clone. Each of 16 metaphases was abnormal; the tumor cells appeared to be homozygously deficient for the region 22q11.2qter. In another case, 53% of interphase nuclei showed three FISH signals with a chromosome 14/22 probe, thus suggesting either monosomy for the centromere of chromosome 14 or that of chromosome 22.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
长期以来,神经束膜瘤的本质一直存在争议,它曾被称为“局限性肥厚性神经病”“神经内神经纤维瘤”及“肥厚性间质性神经炎”。大多数作者认为它是一种肿瘤,但也有一些人认为是一种反应性过程。我们采用组织学、免疫组织化学及超微结构方法研究了8例临床及形态学典型的神经束膜瘤。对其中1例神经束膜瘤进行了组织培养和细胞遗传学研究,另1例进行了荧光原位杂交(FISH)分析。患者共8例,男性3例,女性5例,年龄在11至38岁之间。所有肿瘤均位于神经内,累及四肢(2例坐骨神经、1例正中神经、1例股神经、1例腓总神经、1例臂丛神经、1例尺神经和1例桡神经)。神经症状均为运动障碍,4例伴有感觉障碍,病程从1个月至7年(平均1.2年)。仅2例患者临床上可见梭形、节段性神经增粗,但8例患者中有5例在磁共振成像(MRI)上表现明显。病变长度为3.5至30 cm,最大的累及从闭孔到膝部的坐骨神经。1例病变累及两个神经根,但未发现与神经皮肤综合征相关。6例行活检,2例行切除。组织学上,由上皮膜抗原反应性、S-100蛋白阴性的神经束膜细胞组成的假洋葱球围绕有髓或无髓神经纤维。许多伴有S-100蛋白阳性的施万细胞鞘。一些漩涡状结构缺乏中央轴突。1例可见单个有丝分裂。MIB-1抗原标记指数为4%至17%。6例p53抗原染色显示无(6例中的2例)、罕见(6例中的2例)或散在(6例中的2例)免疫反应性核。1例细胞遗传学分析显示有一个染色体异常克隆。16个中期相均异常;肿瘤细胞似乎在22q11.2qter区域纯合缺失。另1例中,53%的间期核在用14号/22号染色体探针检测时显示3个FISH信号,提示可能是14号染色体或22号染色体着丝粒单体缺失。(摘要截断于400字)