Assessment of the power and height of radial aspheres reported by a computer-assisted keratoscope.

PURPOSE

The two purposes of this study were (a) to assess the accuracy with which a keratoscope, the Topographic Modeling System (TMS-1), calculated the heights and powers of rotationally symmetric, radially aspheric test surfaces and (b) to determine whether the TMS-1 used an axial solution for radius of curvature to determine the power of a sphere that would produce the same semichord as would the test surface on a keratograph.

METHODS

The TMS-1 heights and powers were studied for four test surfaces that had radial profiles similar to those of normal corneas. The powers of the surfaces were calculated from the local radius of curvature derived from the surfaces' manufacturing formulas. The heights and powers that would result from an axial solution were calculated in a TMS-1 simulator. TMS-1 data were compared with data from the surfaces' formulas and with data from the simulation.

RESULTS

The TMS-1 data were almost identical to the heights and powers calculated from the simulated axial solution. The TMS-1 data were similar to the heights and powers calculated from the mathematical formulas from the apex to 2 mm from the apex but differed by up to 85 microns of height and 10 diopters of power in the periphery.

CONCLUSIONS

The TMS-1 appeared to use the axial solution that does not calculate power from local radius of curvature. Clinicians should use caution when inferring corneal shape from power maps based on an axial solution, especially outside the central 2-mm radius of a normal cornea, because such power does not depict corneal curvature.