Joss R A, Bacchi M, Hürny C, Bernhard J, Cerny T, Martinelli G, Leyvraz S, Senn H J, Stahel R, Siegenthaler P
Department of Medicine, Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Ann Oncol. 1995 Feb;6(2):157-66. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059111.
From 1984 to 1989, the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) performed a randomized phase III trial comparing early versus late alternating chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer.
406 eligible patients were entered into the trial. Regimen A consisted of PAV (cisPlatin, Adriamycin, VP 16-213, and Regimen B of CyMOC (Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, Oncovin, CCNU). Cycles were repeated as rapidly as possible. patients were randomized to receive either ABABAB (early alternating chemotherapy) or AAABBB (late alternating chemotherapy). After six cycles patients with limited disease in complete or partial remission and those with extensive disease in complete remission received irradiation to the primary (45 Gy) and the CNS (36 Gy).
The overall remission rate was 87% with 31% complete remissions. The median survival of all 406 eligible patients was 346 days with 15% of the patients alive at two years. The overall remission rate, the rate of complete remission, the median survival and the rate of long-term survival were not significantly different in the two treatment arms. In limited disease the estimated percentages of survival at 2 years were 33% in the early and 24% in the late alternating chemotherapy arms. Patients with extensive disease survived significantly longer with late alternating chemotherapy than on the early alternation regimen (median survival 336 days versus 301 days, p = 0.01). In the latter patients the received dose intensities (RDI) of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide were significantly higher in the late-alternation arm. Patients treated with early alternating chemotherapy rated their tumor symptoms, functional states, fatigue/malaise and restriction of social activity significantly better, reflecting an improved subjective adjustment.
Alternating chemotherapy with PAV-CyMOC plus consolidating radiotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment for small-cell lung cancer, with acceptable toxicity. Whereas patients with early alternating chemotherapy achieve a better subjective adjustment, late alternating chemotherapy allows for a higher RDI of cisplatin, adriamycin and etoposide, which results in a significantly longer median survival of patients with extensive disease.
1984年至1989年,瑞士临床癌症研究组(SAKK)开展了一项III期随机试验,比较小细胞肺癌患者早期与晚期交替化疗的效果。
406例符合条件的患者进入该试验。方案A由PAV(顺铂、阿霉素、VP 16 - 213)组成,方案B由CyMOC(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤、长春新碱、洛莫司汀)组成。尽可能快速重复周期。患者被随机分为接受ABABAB(早期交替化疗)或AAABBB(晚期交替化疗)。六个周期后,疾病局限且完全或部分缓解的患者以及疾病广泛且完全缓解的患者接受对原发灶(45 Gy)和中枢神经系统(36 Gy)的放疗。
总缓解率为87%,完全缓解率为31%。所有406例符合条件患者的中位生存期为346天,两年时15%的患者存活。两个治疗组的总缓解率、完全缓解率、中位生存期和长期生存率无显著差异。在疾病局限的患者中,早期交替化疗组和晚期交替化疗组两年时的估计生存率分别为33%和24%。疾病广泛的患者接受晚期交替化疗的生存期明显长于早期交替化疗方案(中位生存期336天对301天,p = 0.01)。在后者中,晚期交替化疗组顺铂、阿霉素和依托泊苷的实际剂量强度(RDI)明显更高。接受早期交替化疗的患者对其肿瘤症状、功能状态、疲劳/不适和社会活动受限的评分明显更好,反映出主观调整有所改善。
PAV - CyMOC交替化疗加巩固放疗是治疗小细胞肺癌的一种可行且有效的方法,毒性可接受。早期交替化疗的患者实现了更好的主观调整,而晚期交替化疗使顺铂、阿霉素和依托泊苷的RDI更高,这导致疾病广泛的患者中位生存期明显更长。